Kamis, 06 Februari 2020

This 1 Tweet Pretty Much Sums Up the Difference Between Kate Middleton and Meghan Markle - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Kate Middleton and Meghan Markle have received very different media treatment since both of them joined the royal family (Meghan has since left the family). Over the past few years, Meghan has dealt with a lot of negativity from the British media, and it eventually proved to be too much for her.

Earlier this year, Meghan and Prince Harry ultimately decided to leave the family, and it left some people wondering why. But one tweet easily summed up the stark difference between Kate and Meghan when it comes to the media.

Kate Middleton and Meghan Markle
Kate Middleton and Meghan Markle | Clive Mason/Getty Images

Kate and Meghan were reportedly feuding during Meghan’s time in the family

When Meghan first married Harry, it seemed to be the start of a very happy ending. But the Duchess of Sussex quickly realized that things weren’t going to be so easy. Almost instantly, rumors started to swirl that Meghan and Kate did not get along.

Though the rumors were never proven true, it resulted in a lot of the British public choosing sides — and many of them chose Kate. The feud seemed to be the fuel that started the fire of poor treatment toward the Duchess of Sussex, despite that there was never any confirmation of a feud to begin with.

Kate Middleton and Meghan Markle
There is no true proof of a feud between the two duchesses. | Chris Jackson/WPA Pool/Getty Images

The two women have been treated very differently by the British press

When Kate first joined the family, she was welcomed by the media with open arms. The press instantly adored her, and since they always published positive stories about her, the public quickly learned to love her as well. Plus, Kate was the first wife to marry into the family between Prince William and Prince Harry, which meant the press didn’t have anyone to compare her to.

Meghan, on the other hand, was instantly compared to Kate when she joined the royals. And since Kate had built up such a strong reputation among the royal public, it was hard for Meghan to compete. Though the comparison wasn’t appropriate by the press, it was, in some ways, to be expected.

1 tweet sums up the major difference between the two: Their media treatment

Kate and Meghan have, undoubtedly, received completely different media treatment since becoming royals. And it just might be the biggest difference between them. Though the media has suggested the two have nothing in common, the only true similarity they likely don’t share is their portrayal in the media.

Dr. Benjamin Janaway, a psychiatrist with a verified Twitter account and more than 33,000 followers, tweeted what seems to be the perfect example of the way the media treats each woman. Janaway suggests that The Sun, a popular British tabloid, would spin the same story about each woman into something positive for Kate and something negative for Meghan. Janaway’s tweet says that if Kate were to breathe, The Sun would say she “leads way on fueling trees,” but if Meghan were to breathe, The Sun would say she’s “stealing” the public’s air.

Kate has thrived in the family, but it’s always been easy for her

Kate immediately found her way in the spotlight; the transition for Meghan wasn’t so easy. But a major part of that could be that the media instantly took a liking to Kate, which helped her acclimate to royal life so quickly. It’s easy to adapt when one is so adored by the public; when it’s the opposite, it’s not.

Meghan and Harry’s decision to leave the family seemed to be the only way to escape the harsh microscope that Meghan was constantly under. Hopefully they’ll find their way now that they’ve officially exited royal life.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMicWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNoZWF0c2hlZXQuY29tL2VudGVydGFpbm1lbnQvdGhpcy10d2VldC1zdW1zLXVwLWRpZmZlcmVuY2UtYmV0d2Vlbi1rYXRlLW1pZGRsZXRvbi1tZWdoYW4tbWFya2xlLmh0bWwv0gEA?oc=5

2020-02-06 19:10:55Z
52780591573773

Prosecution rests in Harvey Weinstein's rape trial after 6 accusers testify - CNN

Over the past two weeks, prosecutors said Weinstein was a powerful movie producer who used that power to prey on young, inexperienced women hoping to establish their movie careers.
Weinstein is charged with five counts, including rape, criminal sexual act and predatory sexual assault, which is punishable by up to life in prison. The charges are based on Miriam Haley's testimony that Weinstein forced oral sex on her in 2006 and Jessica Mann's testimony that he raped her twice during an abusive relationship.
In addition, "The Sopranos" actress Annabella Sciorra testified last week that Weinstein raped her in the winter of 1993-94, which is relevant to the predatory sexual assault charges. Three other women testified as so-called "prior bad acts" witnesses as prosecutors sought to show that Weinstein had a pattern of sexual abuse.
Weinstein's defense has argued that the sexual encounters were consensual, and as evidence, they have pointed to friendly messages that the women sent to Weinstein after the alleged attacks.
"I love you, I always do. but I hate feeling like a booty call. :)" Mann wrote in a message in February 2017, four years after the alleged rape.
To combat that point, a forensic psychiatrist testified for the prosecution that it was a "rape myth" that victims of sexual violence behave a certain way. Some victims continue to interact with their abusers afterward, Dr. Barbara Ziv testified.
Indeed, Mann testified that the 2017 message does not prove the attack didn't happen.
"I know the history of my relationship with him. I know it is complicated and different but it does not change the fact that he raped me," she testified.
Weinstein's attorneys closely cross-examined each of the women about what the attorneys say are inconsistencies in their stories. Mann's cross-examination spanned three days of court and had to be stopped at one point when she had a panic attack on the witness stand.
His defense can now call its own witnesses. Weinstein is not expected to testify.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiSGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNubi5jb20vMjAyMC8wMi8wNi91cy9oYXJ2ZXktd2VpbnN0ZWluLXRyaWFsLXJlc3QvaW5kZXguaHRtbNIBTGh0dHBzOi8vYW1wLmNubi5jb20vY25uLzIwMjAvMDIvMDYvdXMvaGFydmV5LXdlaW5zdGVpbi10cmlhbC1yZXN0L2luZGV4Lmh0bWw?oc=5

2020-02-06 18:19:00Z
52780592316392

Gayle King responds to backlash over Kobe Bryant sexual assault question - NBC News

Gayle King has responded to backlash over her asking about the Kobe Bryant rape case in an interview with WNBA star Lisa Leslie by blaming CBS for its edited clip of the conversation.

In a short clip of the "CBS This Morning" interview posted on social media Tuesday, show co-host King asks Leslie if she thinks Bryant's legacy is "complicated" by the 2003 sexual assault charge.

"Is it complicated for you, as a woman, as a WNBA player?" King asks in the interview done subsequent to the death of Bryant and eight other people, including his 13-year-old daughter, in a Jan. 26 helicopter crash in Calabasas, California.

Leslie, a longtime friend of Bryant's, says, "It's not complicated for me at all."

Bryant was not the "kind of person that would do something to violate a woman or be aggressive in that way," Leslie says. "That's just not the person that I know."

King suggests that Leslie, as Bryant's friend, would not be able to see him in that way.

"That's possible," Leslie says. "I just don't believe that.

Bryant was accused in 2003 of sexually assaulting a 19-year-old hotel employee in Colorado. He was charged with rape, but the case was dropped after the accuser declined to testify. A civil suit was later settled. The NBA star, who married wife Vanessa in 2001, admitted to having had sex with the woman, but insisted that it was consensual.

The Morning Rundown

Get a head start on the morning's top stories.

In the clip of the interview with Leslie, King raises the possibility that bringing up Bryant's sexual assault case may not be fair "considering he's no longer with us, and that it was resolved."

Alternatively, she says, "Is it really part of his history?"

Leslie responds, "I think the media should be more respectful at this time."

"If you had questions about it, you had many years to ask him that. I don't think it's something that we should keep hanging over his legacy," she says.

King's raising the issue of Bryant's rape case in the wake of his death led to swift outrage on social media.

Many celebrities, including Snoop Dogg, weighed in. In an expletive-laden video, Snoop Dogg said King's question was "out of pocket" and accused her of trying to tarnish Bryant's reputation.

King responded to the backlash in two videos posted on her Twitter page Thursday morning, calling out CBS for posting only a small portion of her interview with Leslie without providing the full context.

"I know that if I had only seen the clip that you saw, I would be extremely angry with me too. I am mortified. I'm embarrassed and I am very angry," she said. "Unbeknownst to me my network put up a clip from a very wide-ranging interview, totally taken out of context and when you see it that way it's very jarring."

King said during her conversation with Leslie they talked about Bryant's career, his sense of humor, how he was a mentor to many people and how he was looking forward to the next chapter in his life.

"It was wide-ranging," she reiterated, adding: "Yes, we talked about that court case because that court case has also come up. And I wanted to get Lisa's take on it as a friend who knew him well."

King said she thought it was "very powerful" when Leslie said it's time for the media to stop bringing up the case. She said she insisted that part of their discussion be included in the tape of the interview because it "put a nice button on that part of the conversation."

"I felt really good about the interview. So for the network to take the most salacious part, when taken out of context, and put it up online for people who didn't see the whole interview is very upsetting to me," she explained. "There will be a very intense discussion about that."

King ended her video by reflecting on the times she met Bryant, calling him warm and kind.

"I too am mourning his loss just like everybody else. I still am shocked by it. It's tragic and untimely and the last thing I would want to do is disparage him at this particular time," she said.

CBS did not immediately return multiple requests for comment.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMicmh0dHA6Ly93d3cubmJjbmV3cy5jb20vbmV3cy91cy1uZXdzL2dheWxlLWtpbmctcmVzcG9uZHMtYmFja2xhc2gtb3Zlci1rb2JlLWJyeWFudC1zZXh1YWwtYXNzYXVsdC1xdWVzdGlvbi1uMTEzMTQ3NtIBLGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lm5iY25ld3MuY29tL25ld3MvYW1wL25jbmExMTMxNDc2?oc=5

2020-02-06 16:22:00Z
52780592610849

Oscars 2020 Predictions Category by Category, Using Math - Hollywood Reporter

A category-by-category forecast on which victories are the most likely at the 92nd Academy Awards.

Consider the following Oscar facts:

1. Since the creation of the best film editing award in 1934, no film has won best picture without either an editing or acting nomination.

2. Since the creation of the Directors Guild Awards in 1948, no film has won best picture without either a DGA win or an editing nomination.

3. No foreign-language film has ever won best picture.

4. No film produced by a streaming service has won best picture.

5. No comic book film has won best picture.

And yet, if 1917 wins, the first of those facts will fall. Same for Once Upon a Time in Hollywood with the second fact, Parasite the third, The Irishman the fourth, and Joker the fifth. Does this mean we can rule out all five of these films on Sunday night? Of course not.

This is where statistics comes in. Statistics doesn’t mean hunting for absolutes and assigning 0 percent or 100 percent to everything. It means giving each piece of information the proper weight, and translating those weights into probabilities. Each year for the past nine years, I’ve predicted the Oscars using nothing but probability. On my computer, facts like the ones above and many more get converted into data, plugged into formulas, and output into the charts you see below. Math and Oscar history can’t guarantee any wins, but they can point the way to which wins are the most likely.

Best Picture

Turns out math is going with the first best picture nominee in history whose entire title is a number, 1917. Thanks to wins from groups including the Golden Globes, the Producers Guild, the Directors Guild, and the BAFTAs, the two-hour tracking shot is in front to win the top prize. But don’t count out Screen Actors Guild best cast victor Parasite or Golden Globe and Critics' Choice winner Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. Keep in mind that The Irishman got 10 nominations and Joker got 11, and this race is far from over.

Best Director

It’s been 17 years since an Oscar nominee for best director won the DGA Award but lost the Oscar. That year, Rob Marshall (Chicago) won the DGA but Roman Polanski (The Pianist) took the Academy Award. In between, there was an odd year when Ben Affleck (Argo) won the DGA but wasn’t nominated for the Oscar. Still, it’s a nearly airtight rule that the DGA winner is the favorite in this category, and 2019 is no exception. Sam Mendes choreographed an epic war film with only a small number of nearly imperceptible cuts, and he is the odds-on favorite to be rewarded for his work with a golden trophy.

Best Actor

Joaquin Phoenix has dominated awards season for his terrifying portrayal of the title character in Joker. A four-time nominee (previous nominations for Gladiator, Walk the Line and The Master), this could finally be the year that puts Phoenix on top. No one has ever won — or even been nominated — for a lead acting category for a comic book film (Heath Ledger’s win for the same role was in the supporting race), but Phoenix appears all set to make history.

Best Actress

Renée Zellweger (Judy) has also run the table this awards season. Making her path (and Phoenix’s) even easier is that the two Golden Globe acting winners for comedy/musicals — Taron Egerton (Rocketman) and Awkwafina (The Farewell) — weren’t even nominated at the Oscars, while Phoenix and Zellweger took the drama categories. The last time that neither comedy/musical winner at the Globes received an Oscar nomination was 2008, when Colin Farrell (In Bruges) and Sally Hawkins (Happy-Go-Lucky) went overlooked by the Academy.

Best Supporting Actor

Brad Pitt may play the stuntman to Leonardo DiCaprio’s leading man in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, but there’s no denying he’s in the inner circle of A-list Hollywood stars. And yet, he’s never won an acting Oscar, with a lone trophy for producing 12 Years a Slave (2013). Whether due to the performance itself or due to wanting to push Pitt over the finish line — or perhaps a little of both — the major precursors all lined up behind him for the supporting actor race.

Best Supporting Actress

The acting categories all feel very similar this year. Once again, we have a contender who swept the Golden Globe, Critics' Choice, SAG and BAFTA awards, and has previous Oscar nominations. In this race, it’s Laura Dern out in front, trying to win her first Oscar for her role as a divorce attorney in Marriage Story.

Best Original Screenplay

Quentin Tarantino (Once Upon a Time in Hollywood) seemed primed to tie Woody Allen for the most Oscar wins for best original screenplay, with three. And then, this past weekend, his lead collapsed. On Saturday night, Tarantino was ineligible at the Writers Guild Awards, which my model accounts for, and Parasite took the award. Less than 24 hours later, Parasite’s Bong Joon Ho and Han Jin-won repeated their win at the BAFTAs — this time going head-to-head with Tarantino — and that was barely enough to put the South Korean heart-pounder in first.

Best Adapted Screenplay

Just like its original counterpart, best adapted screenplay saw a last-second surge. Greta Gerwig (Little Women) began on top with wins from the USC Scripter Awards and a number of critics groups. But on the final pre-Oscars weekend, Little Women went head-to-head against Jojo Rabbit at the Writers Guild Awards and BAFTAs. Taika Waititi went two-for-two in those matchups, and the math now favors him to make it a third straight win at the Oscars.

Best Animated Feature

The most honored member of the bunch, Toy Story 4, holds the statistical lead. But there are reasons to doubt Buzz and Woody’s path to the podium. For one thing, no franchise has ever won this category twice, and Toy Story already had its turn for part three in 2010. For another, the previous awards were far from unanimous, with Missing Link taking the Golden Globe and Klaus winning the BAFTA.

Best Documentary Feature

The mathematical leader is American Factory, which garnered extra press as the first film produced by Barack and Michelle Obama’s production company. But it’s a nail-biter: Honeyland is the first movie in Oscar history to be nominated for both best documentary feature and best international feature (the new name for best foreign-language film). And on Sunday, For Sama beat American Factory at the BAFTAs. Add in the fact that a number of precursor honors went to the unnominated Apollo 11, and this race is wide open.

Best International Feature

This is one of the most lopsided races of the night, for obvious reasons. Parasite has won so many accolades that it’s the second-most-likely film to win best picture, so surely it stands to reason that it’s the best international film of the year. Five previous films have been nominated for this category as well as best picture in the same year, and all five went on to win the International race: Z (1969); Life Is Beautiful (1998); Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (2000); Amour (2012); and Roma (2018).

Best Production Design

1917 won the BAFTA for best production design. Parasite won the Art Directors Guild award for contemporary film. The critics groups were inconsistent. But the math likes Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, thanks to its Critics' Choice win and its Art Directors Guild win in the period film category (which all the non-Parasite Oscar nominees participated in). The film delivered a masterful and nostalgic re-creation of 1969 Los Angeles, and it might just be enough to win an Oscar on Sunday night in Hollywood.

Best Cinematography

It’s hard enough to capture each shot of a war film when the scenes will only last a few seconds before cutting. Now imagine the enormity of Roger Deakins’ challenge to make every moment of 1917 look perfect on the big screen, knowing that the next cut wouldn’t be for many minutes. It felt like this movie’s plot was constantly running, yet the camera kept up beautifully with the actors and the action. Deakins was once known for losing these awards, starting his Oscar career 0/13, but he may be about to win two in three years following his Blade Runner 2049 victory.

Best Original Score

Hildur Gudnadóttir has already made history as the first female solo winner of best original score at the Golden Globes for her haunting soundtrack to Joker. Add on a Critics' Choice and BAFTA win, and there’s your favorite. But don’t count out 1917, whose soaring score added as much to that film as Joker’s did to that one. Composer Thomas Newman is on his 14th nomination, and his fellow Academy members may be anxious to finally bestow him his first trophy.

Best Original Song

Elton John’s annual Oscars party might be a little more celebratory this year if he can follow up on his previous wins for “(I’m Gonna) Love Me Again,” the song he co-wrote with Bernie Taupin for Rocketman. This would be Sir Elton’s second Oscar win, a quarter-century after “Can You Feel the Love Tonight” from The Lion King. But speaking of seconds, “Into the Unknown” from Frozen 2 also has a shot of winning that franchise’s second Oscar for best original song.

Best Film Editing

Boy is this close. This is the only category in which no nominee reached 30 percent or higher to win. But two of them almost reached that threshold. Ford v Ferrari won the BAFTA on Sunday to speed into first place for its slickly edited auto-racing scenes. But Parasite won the drama film category from the American Cinema Editors, which also has a decent track record in this category. Also complicating matters is that tracking-shot film 1917 won the Critics' Choice award for best editing but wasn’t nominated by the Oscars.

Best Visual Effects

This one makes best film editing look like a cakewalk to predict, as we’ve arrived at the single closest race of the night. I’ll admit I let out a small gasp when I saw what my computer spit out on this category. Just 0.1 percentage points separate the mathematical frontrunner Avengers: Endgame, winner of the majority of precursor awards in this category, from 1917, the leader in the betting markets (which are one of the factors in my model). It’s a battle between a film nominated in only this category and a film nominated in nine others.

Best Costume Design

The math likes BAFTA winner Little Women to win best costume design, but there are holes in its Oscar résumé. It doesn’t have a best production design nomination, a category often correlated with this one. It went unnominated by the Costume Designers Guild Awards. The only two Oscar nominees that did receive CDG nominations — Jojo Rabbit and Once Upon a Time in Hollywood — sit in second and third place, respectively, and are also strong contenders to win this one.

Best Makeup and Hairstyling

The top two nominees earn their places for very different tasks. The Bombshell makeup artists and hairstylists had to bring well-known Fox News personalities to the big screen, and did so with astonishing accuracy. Stepping away from the real world, the Joker team had to reinvent one of the most famous villains in the history of fiction, and in doing so aided in Joaquin Phoenix in his haunting performance. Statistics gives the edge to Bombshell.

Best Sound Editing

My model is based on a number of factors, one of them being the betting markets. But it’s not the only factor, so sometimes public perception and data will differ. This year, both sound categories fall into that bucket, as bettors favor 1917 but the math says Ford v Ferrari has the edge in each race. The Motion Picture Sound Editors and the Cinema Audio Society both went for the car-racing sounds of Ford v Ferrari, and we’ll see if Oscar voters do as well.

Best Sound Mixing

If the mathematical favorites were to run the table, this would conclude quite a special night for Ford v Ferrari, winning all of its nominations except Best Picture. Among films with four or more nominations, that’s only been done seven times: The Story of Louis Pasteur (1936), The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938), Miracle on 34th Street (1947), The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948), Jaws (1975), Traffic (2000) and Bohemian Rhapsody (2018). But sweeping is going to be hard — all three of Ford’s potential wins are among the closest categories of the evening.

Note: There isn’t enough data to predict the short film categories with math. In total, there are predictions in 21 categories – 21 envelopes to be opened, 21 bursts of excitement, 21 speeches seen by millions. Who knows what will happen, but thanks to math, we might have just gotten a sneak peek.

Ben Zauzmer (@BensOscarMath) is the author of Oscarmetrics: The Math Behind the Biggest Night in Hollywood.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiZmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmhvbGx5d29vZHJlcG9ydGVyLmNvbS9uZXdzLzIwMjAtb3NjYXJzLXByZWRpY3Rpb25zLWNhdGVnb3J5LWJ5LWNhdGVnb3J5LXVzaW5nLW1hdGgtMTI3NjYwONIBamh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmhvbGx5d29vZHJlcG9ydGVyLmNvbS9hbXAvbmV3cy8yMDIwLW9zY2Fycy1wcmVkaWN0aW9ucy1jYXRlZ29yeS1ieS1jYXRlZ29yeS11c2luZy1tYXRoLTEyNzY2MDg?oc=5

2020-02-06 16:15:00Z
52780590129138

Fortnite adds a Harley Quinn skin to celebrate the release of Birds of Prey - The Verge

Harley Quinn is coming to Fortnite this evening. Developer Epic Games announced a new Harley Quinn skin will be available in its in-game shop at 7PM ET on February 6th, just before the movie starring the famous DC Comics character, Birds of Prey, is released in theaters.

The Harley Quinn skin will be a bundle, which includes other cosmetics like a pickaxe as well as a set of in-game challenges that you can complete to unlock an alternate outfit, appropriately called “Always Fantabulous Harley.”

Harley Quinn is the second DC Comics character to be playable in Fortnite; Batman was available for purchase last year, timed with an event that also dropped Gotham City onto Fortnite’s island.

Epic Games is no stranger to bringing iconic faces into Fortnite as it works to build something that’s like a Ready Player One-style metaverse. Epic released official skins for Star Wars’ Rey and Finn, Marvel’s Black Widow and Star-Lord, and John Wick last year. And the company is even starting to introduce skins based on real people, beginning with January’s skin based on Tyler “Ninja” Blevins.

Epic has also added a new Search and Destroy limited time mode as part of its “Love and War” event. The new mode seems to play a lot like Counter-Strike, pitting two teams against each other to destroy or defend a bomb, depending on which side you’re on. There are also challenges for this mode you can complete to earn cosmetics.

Epic says the Love and War event ends on February 17th, just three days before Fortnite’s next season begins on February 20th.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiXWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZXZlcmdlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzIvNi8yMTEyNTI4MC9mb3J0bml0ZS1oYXJsZXktcXVpbm4tc2tpbi1iaXJkcy1vZi1wcmV5LWNyb3Nzb3ZlctIBamh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZXZlcmdlLmNvbS9wbGF0Zm9ybS9hbXAvMjAyMC8yLzYvMjExMjUyODAvZm9ydG5pdGUtaGFybGV5LXF1aW5uLXNraW4tYmlyZHMtb2YtcHJleS1jcm9zc292ZXI?oc=5

2020-02-06 15:29:35Z
52780588394328

Hollywood icon Kirk Douglas dies at 103 - ABC News

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiK2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9OWd0cTJ5Z3IxLTjSAQA?oc=5

2020-02-06 15:36:46Z
52780593008199

Gayle King Rips CBS For Excerpting Her Lisa Leslie Interview About Kobe Bryant - Deadline

CBS This Morning anchor Gayle King posted a two-part video on social media Thursday morning, saying she was “mortified” and “very angry” at CBS for posting a “salacious” clip of her interview with Lisa Leslie about Kobe Bryant. (See King’s video below.)

In the clip, King asks Leslie, a former WNBA star, about the legacy of Bryant, who died along with eight others in a helicopter crash on January 26, given his sexual assault case in Colorado. While the criminal complaint against him was dropped, Bryant reached an out-of-court settlement with his 19-year-old accuser and issued a statement acknowledging that their sexual encounter may not have seemed consensual to her. The episode has proven a challenging aspect of remembering Bryant.

“It’s been said that his legacy is complicated … Is it complicated for you, as a woman, as a WNBA player?” King asked. Leslie said it was not and said in all her dealings with Bryant she never knew him to be “the kind of person that would … do something to violate a woman or be aggressive in that way.”

In the part that caused backlash on Wednesday, King then replied, “But Lisa, you wouldn’t see it though. As his friend, you wouldn’t see it.”

King blamed CBS (without specifying a division or group responsible) for releasing a clip that she felt was incapable of showing the full scope of the interview, in all of its nuance.

“Unbeknownst to me, my network put up a clip from a very wide-ranging interview,” [It was] totally out of context and when you see it that way, it’s very jarring.

“I’ve been advised to say nothing, just let it go. ‘People will drag you, people will troll you. It will be over in a couple of days.’ But that’s not good enough for me because I really want people to understand what happened here.”

King said Leslie’s perspective on the sexual assault case was important to hear because she is a member of the media, working as an on-air analyst for Fox Sports Florida. “It was very powerful when she looked me in the eye as a member of the media and said, ‘It is time for the media to leave it alone and back off,'” King said, adding that she posed followup questions (which were included in the clip CBS released) just to draw out further thoughts.

“For the network to take the most salacious part, when taken out of context, and put it up online … is very upsetting to me,” King said. When the full interview aired, she added, feedback was positive, including from Leslie.

King ended her message by saying she was still “in mourning” over Bryant’s death. “The last thing I would want to do is disparage him at this particular time.”

CBS News did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Here is King’s two-part video message:

Here’s the segment of the interview that CBS This Morning has on its YouTube channel:

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiVGh0dHBzOi8vZGVhZGxpbmUuY29tLzIwMjAvMDIvZ2F5bGUta2luZy1rb2JlLWJyeWFudC1jYnMtbmV3cy1saXNhLWxlc2xpZS0xMjAyODUzMDY5L9IBWGh0dHBzOi8vZGVhZGxpbmUuY29tLzIwMjAvMDIvZ2F5bGUta2luZy1rb2JlLWJyeWFudC1jYnMtbmV3cy1saXNhLWxlc2xpZS0xMjAyODUzMDY5L2FtcC8?oc=5

2020-02-06 14:49:00Z
52780592610849