Sabtu, 18 Januari 2020

Weinstein attorney Donna Rotunno dishes on 'celebrity victimhood' in #MeToo era - Fox Business

The twelve jurors and three alternates were selected by the close of Harvey Weinstein’s Friday in court, setting the stage for what would soon be an estimated six weeks-long rape and sexual assault trial featuring Hollywood stars, civil rights advocacy and, surely, drama.

Continue Reading Below

It had been two weeks of celebrity sightings – whether inside the courtroom or in front of the New York courthouse – bickering between defense attorneys and prosecutors and a virtual revolving door of roughly 680 potential jurors including the model Gigi Hadid, who wasn't chosen.

Harvey Weinstein, left, arrives at court with his lead attorney Donna Rotunno on Tuesday, Jan. 7, the first day of jury selection. (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer)

HARVEY WEINSTEIN CAUGHT ON CELLPHONE TIRADES: POTENTIAL JUROR

“It went as well as it could have under those circumstances,” Weinstein’s lead attorney, Donna Rotunno, told FOX Business in a telephone interview just hours after court on Friday. “I always say that when the defense takes on a case, you start off every case down 21-to-nothing. That’s the nature of the game.”

Supermodel Gigi Hadid arrives at a Manhattan courthouse for jury selection. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)

Weinstein, 67, is accused of raping a woman in a Manhattan hotel room in 2013 and sexually assaulting another in 2006. If convicted, he could face life in prison.

The once-feared former studio boss behind such Oscar winners as "Pulp Fiction" and "Shakespeare in Love" has said any sexual activity was consensual. The initial claims against him in October 2017, however, fueled a barrage of additional accusations that drove the rise of the #MeToo movement, which called out sexual misconduct, particularly among the powerful and famous.

Coming less than a year after the election of an American president who himself had been accused of inappropriate sexual advances, the Weinstein case was followed by allegations against high-profile personalities from casino mogul Steve Wynn, who stepped down from the company that bears his name, to television personality Charlie Rose, who was fired by CBS and PBS.

Last week, California prosecutors announced a new set of charges against Weinstein -- including forcible rape, sexual penetration by use of force and sexual battery -- in connection with two reported incidents in the course of as many days.

Prosecutors in Los Angeles County accused the movie producer of forcing himself into an unidentified female victim’s hotel room on Feb. 18, 2013, and raping her, according to a statement. He's also accused of assaulting a different woman in a Beverly Hills hotel room a day later.

Despite the defense team's multiple attempts to have the case moved out of New York City, as well as requests to interview potential jurors in private and one to have the judge removed, their efforts were largely unsuccessful.

Opening statements are expected to begin Wednesday.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Amid widespread media coverage and the pressure attached to the case's outcome, Manhattan Supreme Court Judge James Burke at one point warned potential jurors: “This trial is not a referendum on the #MeToo movement.”

Harvey Weinstein arrives at the Oscars in 2014. (Photo by Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP)

Five women and seven men will make up the jury. Of the dozen, four people – one man and three women – are African-American, while a fourth woman is African-American and Latino, ABC News reported. Two women and one man will serve as alternates.

Much of Thursday and Friday were spent with Weinstein’s defense team, led by Rotunno, sparring with prosecutors such as lead attorney Joan Illuzzi – and vice versa – over the ages, genders and races of the potential jurors.

Rotunno came down on assistant district attorney Illuzzi for largely rejecting men as prospective jury members, while the prosecutor complained to the judge that the defense was excluding young, white women.

“He has eliminated every single young, white female from both panels,” Illuzzi said, referring to one of Weinstein’s attorneys, according to Variety.

Donna Rotunno arrives at a Manhattan courthouse on Thursday, Jan. 16, for jury selection in Harvey Weinstein's trial. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)

Rotunno was called out for arguing against a white, female juror because she neglected to inform the court that she was writing a book based on “assumptions about women in the workplace,” according to the report.

The woman was ultimately designated Juror No. 11, Rotunno told FOX Business.

“She did not disclose that she is writing a book called ‘The Age of Consent’ that deals with many issues that this trial is going to address,” Rotunno said during the call. “We did what we could with the constraints that were put on us, and you know, hopefully, we have a fair jury.”

Rotunno took the reins as Weinstein's lead attorney in July and was joined by colleague and fellow attorney Damon Cheronis.

There are so many things that are wrapped up into this case that it would almost be impossible to find this type of perfect storm involved in a case ever again

- Donna Rotunno

“I chose to represent Harvey Weinstein because I think these are the types of cases that lawyers that do what I do live for,” Rotunno said shortly after she joined the legal team, which had already included Arthur Aidala.

The Chicago-based attorney is no stranger to defending men in sexual assault cases, nor is she new to high-profile cases of a sensitive nature.

“In a case like this,” she said,” the deck is stacked against you even more – given media presence, given the pressure on the [district attorney's] office to convict… there's political pressure, there's social pressure, there are the pressures of the movement.”

The #MeToo movement is a topic Rotunno has not shied away from, despite representing a man who, according to a report by The Cut, has been accused of sexual misconduct by at least 100 women. Several accusers, many of whom are celebrities, are expected to testify.

"The court of public opinion takes over, and we lose sight of the fact that Harvey Weinstein is an innocent man unless a jury finds otherwise"

- Donna Rotunno

Rotunno believes the sheer number of accusers lends credence to her arguments in defense of Weinstein.

In some ways, the notion of #MeToo leaves women “feeling like you're a part of something," she said.

"What happens is you might have a memory or a recollection of something that now morphs into something else… there's almost like a celebrity victimhood status now. People join movements and they say, ‘Oh, well, #BelieveAllWomen. Well, OK, if we're going to believe all women, then I can say whatever I want.’”

Actor Rose McGowan, right, speaks at a news conference as actor Rosanna Arquette, center left, listens outside a Manhattan courthouse Jan. 6. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

She called the #MeToo movement “dangerous,” a statement she previously made when being interviewed for a recent New York Times article. “I have to look at #MeToo through the lens of a criminal defense attorney because that's the way #MeToo is affecting my client in this situation," she told FOX Business.

“I believe in the justice system. I believe everyone has a right to the presumption of innocence and everyone has a right to a fair trial and due process,” she said. “And that's what we lose in social movements – people get stripped of their rights, whether it's inadvertent or not ... That's just not the way our system of justice is. That's not what it’s founded on.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiTWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZveGJ1c2luZXNzLmNvbS9saWZlc3R5bGUvd2VpbnN0ZWluLWF0dG9ybmV5LWRvbm5hLXJvdHVubm8tbWUtdG9v0gFRaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZm94YnVzaW5lc3MuY29tL2xpZmVzdHlsZS93ZWluc3RlaW4tYXR0b3JuZXktZG9ubmEtcm90dW5uby1tZS10b28uYW1w?oc=5

2020-01-18 16:41:59Z
52780558221575

Box Office: 'Bad Boys for Life' Eyes $68M, 'Dolittle' Goes to the Dogs - Hollywood Reporter

Starring Robert Downey Jr., 'Dolittle' may only earn $30 million over the long Martin Luther King Jr. weekend.

In another win for Sony Pictures, Bad Boys for Life is laughing much louder than expected in its North American box office debut while, across town, Dolittle is going to the dogs for Universal.

Bad Boys for Life, reteaming Will Smith and Martin Lawrence after a 17-year-hiatus, grossed $23.5 million on Friday for a projected $66 million to $68 million debut over the four-day Martin Luther King Jr. weekend, well ahead of expectations and successfully restarting the action-comedy franchise.

The threequel, earning solid reviews and an A CinemaScore from audiences, will have no trouble scoring the second-best showing ever for the MLK holiday behind American Sniper ($107 million), not adjusted for inflation. And there's already talk of a sequel.

Friday's audience was led by African-Americans (43 percent), males (56 percent) and ticket buyers under the age of 35 (57 percent), according to PostTrak.

Bad Boys 3 cost $90 million to produce before marketing. Years in the making, the R-rated pic was directed by Adil El Arbi and Bilall Fallah.

Dolittle, grossing $6.3 million on Friday, is now looking at a projected four-day gross of $31 million. While that's somewhat ahead of tracking, it is still a dismal start for a film that cost $175 million to $200 million before marketing. The hope now is that family audience gives Dolittle long legs; it also could make up ground overseas.

The period film, starring Robert Downey Jr., hoped to reboot the franchise about the iconic vet who can communicate with animals. Directed and co-written by Stephen Gaghan (Syriana, Traffic), Dolittle was supposed to open last May, but its release was delayed twice after Universal rushed to rework parts of the story and complete reshoots.

The timing of Dolittle, produced by Team Downey, isn't ideal for Universal following office bomb Cats (both films rely heavily on VFX effects, not to mention animals).

Dolittle — ravaged by critics and marking Downey's first turn on the big screen post-Iron Man — had been tracking for a four-day gross of $22 million to $28 million. On Friday, the pic skewed female (61 percent) and Caucasian (60 percent). Ticket buyers gave the film a so-so B CinemaScore.

The last Dolittle movie, starring Eddie Murphy, hit the big screen 19 years ago and was set in contemporary times.

A much-needed balm for Universal is the early success of Sam Mendes and Amblin Entertainment's awards frontrunner 1917, which scored 10 Oscar nominations Jan. 13, including for best picture.

Now in its second weekend of wide release, 1917 isn't all that far behind Doolittle, earning $6.2 million on Friday for a projected four-day weekend of $26.6 million for Universal and Amblin.

1917 isn't the only best-picture enjoying a bump. Parasite, adding 496 theaters for a total location count of 843 — its widest footprint to date — is on course for a four-day weekend of nearly $2 million, followed by a projected $1.6 million for Jojo Rabbit, which upped its theater count by 880 locations to 1,005 following Oscar nominations.

Best picture contender Ford v Ferrari also upped its screen count, and should gross roughly $1.3 million over the holiday frame. Once Upon a Time in Hollywood and Joker also tried to capitalize on their nominations by going back into theaters, but since both movies are available on home entertainment, their weekend box office results will be nominal, or $360,000 and $430,000, respectively.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiY2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmhvbGx5d29vZHJlcG9ydGVyLmNvbS9uZXdzL2JveC1vZmZpY2UtYmFkLWJveXMtbGlmZS1leWVzLTY4bS1kb2xpdHRsZS1nb2VzLWRvZ3MtMTI3MDkzMdIBZ2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmhvbGx5d29vZHJlcG9ydGVyLmNvbS9hbXAvbmV3cy9ib3gtb2ZmaWNlLWJhZC1ib3lzLWxpZmUtZXllcy02OG0tZG9saXR0bGUtZ29lcy1kb2dzLTEyNzA5MzE?oc=5

2020-01-18 16:08:33Z
52780558019167

Box Office: ‘Bad Boys 3’ Dominates Over ‘Dolittle’ With $24M Friday - Forbes

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. Box Office: ‘Bad Boys 3’ Dominates Over ‘Dolittle’ With $24M Friday  Forbes
  2. 'Bad Boys 4' in the Works (Exclusive)  Hollywood Reporter
  3. Giving Strangers A Lyft in Miami  Will Smith
  4. Bad Boys for Life review: the year’s first pleasant surprise  The Verge
  5. Why The Bad Boys For Life Reviews Are So Positive | Screen Rant  Screen Rant
  6. View full coverage on Google News

https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMilQFodHRwczovL3d3dy5mb3JiZXMuY29tL3NpdGVzL3Njb3R0bWVuZGVsc29uLzIwMjAvMDEvMTgvYmFkLWJveXMtZm9yLWxpZmUtMjQtbWlsbGlvbi1kb2xpdHRsZS02LW1pbGxpb24td2lsbC1zbWl0aC1yb2JlcnQtZG93bmV5LWpyLWZyaWRheS1ib3gtb2ZmaWNlL9IBmQFodHRwczovL3d3dy5mb3JiZXMuY29tL3NpdGVzL3Njb3R0bWVuZGVsc29uLzIwMjAvMDEvMTgvYmFkLWJveXMtZm9yLWxpZmUtMjQtbWlsbGlvbi1kb2xpdHRsZS02LW1pbGxpb24td2lsbC1zbWl0aC1yb2JlcnQtZG93bmV5LWpyLWZyaWRheS1ib3gtb2ZmaWNlL2FtcC8?oc=5

2020-01-18 15:53:39Z
52780558019167

Meghan Markle is hunting for luxury real estate in Canada's billionaire's row - Page Six

Meghan Markle is house-hunting in one of Canada’s most exclusive enclaves, eyeing a $27 million waterfront property in Vancouver, in yet another sign that she and Prince Harry are planning a permanent move away from Britain’s royals.

The Duchess of Sussex, who fled to Canada with 8-month-old Archie shortly after she and Prince Harry announced their split from the British royal family earlier this month, has been holed up on Vancouver Island in a lavish property owned by a Canadian billionaire while her husband deals with the fallout of their bombshell announcement in London.

Markle is reportedly interested in purchasing a sprawling 6,900-square-foot property in Vancouver’s Kitsilano neighborhood with panoramic views of the Pacific Ocean and the Vancouver skyline, according to a report in the UK’s Sun newspaper.  The 108-year-old mansion on four levels features six bedrooms and five bathrooms and 20-foot beach-side walls and tall hedges for privacy.

“Meghan has expressed an interest in this beautiful house,” a realtor told the newspaper last week. “It would be perfect for her, Harry and little Archie.

“The neighborhood is known as a haven for wealthy people and has a very laid-back atmosphere. I’m sure they would be very happy there, and they would be welcomed with open arms.”

The tony neighborhood, which features yoga on nearby Kitsilano Beach, is home to a group of moneyed entrepreneurs, including Canadian billionaire Chip Wilson who founded the Lululemon yoga wear empire, and whose mansion is worth more than $40 million.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiWWh0dHBzOi8vcGFnZXNpeC5jb20vMjAyMC8wMS8xOC9tZWdoYW4tbWFya2xlLWlzLWh1bnRpbmctZm9yLWx1eHVyeS1yZWFsLWVzdGF0ZS1pbi1jYW5hZGEv0gFdaHR0cHM6Ly9wYWdlc2l4LmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzE4L21lZ2hhbi1tYXJrbGUtaXMtaHVudGluZy1mb3ItbHV4dXJ5LXJlYWwtZXN0YXRlLWluLWNhbmFkYS9hbXAv?oc=5

2020-01-18 14:07:00Z
52780542675596

Painting found hidden in Italian gallery wall confirmed as long-lost Klimt - CNN

Written by Amy Woodyatt, CNN

Italian authorities have confirmed a painting found hidden in the wall of a Piacenza art gallery is the long-lost "Portrait of a Lady" by Austrian artist Gustav Klimt.
In December, gardeners at the Ricci Oddi Modern Art in Piacenza found the canvas, partially concealed by a black trash bag, while cleaning ivy off a wall.

The workers discovered the trash bag with the painting after they opened a small, rusted metal door which revealed a cavity that had been hidden by more than 30cm of ivy, gallery employee Dario Gallinari told CNN in December.

The portrait, which depicts a young woman with rouged cheeks and dark hair, disappeared from the gallery during a building renovation in 1997 and was presumed stolen.

In a statement published on their website on Friday, the gallery said that experts had deemed the painting to be authentic.

The painting's disappearance in 1977 was somewhat of a mystery -- its frame was found near the gallery's skylight shortly after the work disappeared, leading to speculation that the thieves could have entered and left through it.

A forgery of the painting, wrapped up and posted to a disgraced politician, was seized by authorities a month later, Reuters news agency reported -- adding further intrigue to the case.

But the discovery of the painting inside the wall suggests the work may have never even left the building, according to CNN affiliate Sky TG24.

According to head of culture Jonathan Papamarenghi, "Portrait of a Lady" was second on the list of the most valuable artworks missing in Italy, after a work by Caravaggio stolen from a church in Sicily in 1969, Reuters news agency reported.

The painting was part of a series of female portraits that Klimt painted in the last few years of his life, some of which were never finished.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiT2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNubi5jb20vc3R5bGUvYXJ0aWNsZS9rbGltdC1wYWludGluZy1hdXRoZW50aWMtaW50bC1zY2xpL2luZGV4Lmh0bWzSAUtodHRwczovL3d3dy5jbm4uY29tL3N0eWxlL2FtcC9rbGltdC1wYWludGluZy1hdXRoZW50aWMtaW50bC1zY2xpL2luZGV4Lmh0bWw?oc=5

2020-01-18 13:29:04Z
52780558179326

Is Prince George Considered A Senior Member of the Royal Family? - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s shocking exit from the royal family has left fans wondering who is considered senior members of the monarchy. It is widely speculated that senior royals are those in direct line to the throne — but does that include Prince William’s oldest, son, Prince George? Here’s a look at what Harry and Meghan’s exit means for the royal line of succession.

Prince George
Prince George of Cambridge | Pool/Samir Hussein/WireImage

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle shock the world

Harry and Meghan upended the royal family when they announced their decision to step down on Instagram. The couple explained how they want to become financially independent from the royal family and set up a second base in North America.

“After many months of reflection and internal discussions, we have chosen to make a transition this year in starting to carve out a progressive new role within this institution. We intend to step back as ‘senior’ members of the Royal Family and work to become financially independent, while continuing to fully support Her Majesty The Queen,” they shared.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex added that they will continue to support the monarchy. They also plan to keep up their charitable endeavors, mainly through their new organization, Sussex Royal.

It is unclear how the pair will finance everything, as most of their work has been paid for via Harry’s family. It will also be interesting to see how closely Harry and Meghan work with William and Kate Middleton, especially in light of their abrupt exit.

The couple’s note on social media was long, but it did not explain what will happen to the line of succession now that Harry is bowing out. It also raised questions about who is considered to be senior members of the royal family.

A look at the royal line of succession

As the oldest son of Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip, Prince Charles is the first in line to the throne. Charles recently turned 71 years old and has waited longer than anyone to inherit the crown.

While Charles continues to wait for his turn at the head of the monarchy, Prince William is second in the royal line of succession. Once Charles takes the throne, William will likely be named the Prince of Wales and will take over his father’s duties at the Duchy of Cornwall.

Prince George, meanwhile, is third in line to the throne and will someday become the King of the United Kingdom (assuming everything goes as planned). Because George is in the direct line of succession, he is considered to be a part of the inner circle of royals.

But because Prince George is only six years old, it will be a long time before he starts taking on royal duties. Although Harry, who is sixth in line, is stepping down from his royal duties, he does not lose his place in the line of succession.

According to Oprah Magazine, it will take an act of Parliament to kick Prince Harry off the line of succession. While Harry will no longer be in the royal spotlight, he will remain sixth in line to the throne.

Inside Prince George’s historic portrait

As a senior member of the royal family, Queen Elizabeth included George in a historic portrait for the start of the new year.

The image, which was shared on social media, features Her Majesty posing alongside Charles, William, and George.

The photo was snapped by photographer Ranald Mackechnie inside the Throne Room at Buckingham Palace. Queen Elizabeth shared a similar photo in 2016, which also marked her 90th birthday.

What’s the fallout from Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s decision?

Apart from Harry keeping his place in line to the throne, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are not expected to lose any of their titles. In their statement, Harry and Meghan assured everyone that they will continue some of their duties to the crown, which should keep their titles intact.

As far as their house is concerned, Harry and Meghan plan on living inside Frogmore Cottage for the foreseeable future. On their official website, the couple says that they will remain in Windsor for as long as Queen Elizabeth gives them permission.

The pair added that all of the renovations to Frogmore Cottage were in the works long before they decided to move in. They also said that it would have cost the royal family more money to renovate Kensington Palace.

Prince Harry and Meghan have not revealed how they plan on funding their move to North America, though her connections in Hollywood will likely play a part in them gaining financial freedom.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMibmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNoZWF0c2hlZXQuY29tL2VudGVydGFpbm1lbnQvaXMtcHJpbmNlLWdlb3JnZS1jb25zaWRlcmVkLWEtc2VuaW9yLW1lbWJlci1vZi10aGUtcm95YWwtZmFtaWx5Lmh0bWwv0gEA?oc=5

2020-01-18 11:31:09Z
52780542675596

Disney culls 'Fox' from 20th Century Fox in rebrand - BBC News

Disney executives have cut the word "Fox" from their 20th Century Fox film studio in an apparent bid to distance it from operations of the previous owner, Rupert Murdoch.

US media suggests Disney does not want to it to be associated with the media mogul's highly partisan, right-wing Fox News network.

However, Disney has not clarified its reasons.

It bought the studio, with other media operations, in a $71bn deal last March.

20th Century Fox is known for producing some of the biggest films of all-time, including Avatar and Titanic.

Variety magazine, which broke the news about the name change, said it had spoken to an unnamed Disney source, who said: "I think the Fox name means Murdoch, and that is toxic."

Hollywood is known for being liberal, unlike the Australian tycoon.

Disney has also renamed Fox Searchlight Pictures, the arthouse arm, as simply Searchlight Pictures.

Staff emails were changed on Friday, from @fox.com to @20thcenturystudios.com or @searchlight.com.

The original 20th Century Fox company was formed in 1935 following a merger.

Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation bought it in the mid-1980s, and the Fox News channel was created in 1996, growing to become most-watched in the US.

News Corporation was later split into News Corp and 21st Century Fox - which Disney acquired as the parent company of various film and television studios, including the renowned 20th Century Fox.

The Murdoch family retained the news outlets in a spin-off company, Fox Corporation, which is run by Rupert Murdoch's son Lachland.

Variety says the 20th Century Fox studio's well-known fanfare theme and searchlight logo will be retained.

Disney also runs 20th Century Fox Television and Fox 21 Television Studios. Any changes to their names have not been announced.

Disney is already a dominant force in US news, as the owner of the ABC network. It is also hoping to challenge Netflix with its own streaming service Disney+, which launched in the US last year.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiKmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy9idXNpbmVzcy01MTE2MDIxOdIBLmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy9hbXAvYnVzaW5lc3MtNTExNjAyMTk?oc=5

2020-01-18 10:52:30Z
52780558343638