Rabu, 08 Januari 2020

The Party Of Five reboot may be “timely,” but its story is older than the original - The A.V. Club

Party Of Five
Photo: Gilles Mungasson (Freeform)

A Gen X classic gets an added dose of urgency in Freeform’s Party Of Five, one of the few TV reboots to offer meaningful updates while recapturing much of the magic of the original. Series creators Amy Lippman and Christopher Keyser return to their story of five siblings who must navigate adolescence and life in general (mostly) on their own after losing their parents. But, as Lippman has said in the lead up to the premiere, she and Keyser weren’t just looking to indulge in nostalgia; rather, they saw an opportunity to combine the age-old story of children (and teens) forced to grow up too fast with the reality of an immigration policy that has only grown more inhumane with time. What they have (re)created is a smart and moving family drama that really grows into its own.

Several key changes have been made to the framework: The Mexican-American Acosta family stands in for the Salingers, and the setting appears to have been moved from San Francisco to Los Angeles (at least, based on references to the proximity to U.S.-Mexico border). Lippman and Keyser, who co-wrote the first three episodes, also revise the tragedy that sets the series into motion—rather than lose their parents to a drunk driver, Emilio (Brandon Larracuente), Beto (Niko Guardado), Lucía (Emily Tosta), Valentina (Elle Paris Gelaspi), and Rafael (Lennox and Maverick Ashby) watch as Javier (Bruno Bichir) and Gloria Acosta (Fernanda Urrejola) are hauled off by ICE agents. This wrenching scene—set in the middle of family dinner, no less—comes just minutes into the pilot, and it’s not the only time we watch the Acosta family bid tearful goodbyes to each other. But it’s far from the last we see of Javier and Gloria; they’re still able (for now) to check in on their kids via Skype and phone calls.

Advertisement

However, that change doesn’t in any way diminish the trauma of being torn apart as a result of decisions made by people far removed from everyday life in this country; the family is beset by nightmares, resentment, money troubles, and, in the case of Emilio, fear of losing his DACA status. These complications generate consistent drama, but they also lend greater specificity and purpose to this retelling. Along with charming performances, purpose is what propels the pilot, which is otherwise a straightforward introduction. The new cast members are each given a chance to shine (albeit in regrettable circumstances), starting with Bichir and Urrejola, who bring passion and pathos to their roles. Larracuente provides a good, brooding anchor, while Guardado is the perfect combination of annoying younger sibling and nurturing older brother. Gelaspi is soulful but never an “old soul” cliché, but it’s Tosta who stands out in the early episodes. As the byzantine and counterintuitive nature of immigration policy and the path to citizenship reveals itself, Tosta gradually trades a more placid exterior for simmering resentment, without losing Luce’s multidimensionality. (The cachetón Rafa, played by infant twins, is kind of just there, because… he’s an infant.)

Lippman and Keyser, who co-wrote the premiere with Michael Zebede, draw the necessary parallels between their ’90s ensemble—including Gen X teen icons Scott Wolf, Neve Campbell, and Matthew Fox—and the new class. Emilio (or Milo, as he’s known to promoters and fellow musicians) is the hot, prodigal son with a fantastic head of hair and an aversion to commitment, who nonetheless finds himself in charge of a family and a restaurant. Precocious tween Valentina is a math nerd instead of a virtuoso violinist, but she feels her parents’ absence more than her sister or brothers. Like Bailey, Beto is the sensitive teen athlete who is also the linchpin; he struggles more visibly than anyone else to juggle school and family obligations. Lucía is highly intelligent like her Salinger counterpart, and is also eager to shed the good, obedient girl image she no longer relates to—but she’s far angrier than Julia or even any of the other Acosta kids.

Photo: Gilles Mungasson (Freeform)
Advertisement

It’s often through Lucía that Party Of Five voices the rightful frustration that immigrant families and Latinx families feel at being pawns in a political game. To do that properly and poignantly, there’s Latinx (and Hispanic) talent behind the scenes as well, including Zebede, a writer and co-executive producer, writer/producer Mary Angélica Molina, producer/director Rodrigo Garcia, and director Eva Vives. Along with Lippman and Keyser, this creative team crafts a tale still too rarely seen—that of people of color for whom assimilation and aspiration may not be enough—along with others that aren’t quite as specific, but just as relatable: those of love triangles and other romantic foibles; of wondering where you belong; of rebelling against a stifling status quo.

There’s a greater focus on teen angst and rites of passage in Party Of Five than overt social commentary, which can feel more groundbreaking and political than its real-life allusions. For the next 10 Wednesday nights, viewers will gather with a family that may or may not resemble their own, but is still relatable. The Acostas are caught up in a quagmire, but their lives mattered before zero-tolerance policy was implemented, and their lives will continue to matter as debates are held and changes made (or not). And as the season unfolds, the combination of this particular premise with this particular family becomes even more complementary, almost poetic. Brown kids (and Black and Indigenous kids) in this country are often made to grow up fast; they’re also, all too often, growing up in a world that doesn’t care as much about them. Headlines and tweets may make the Party Of Five reboot seem timely, but it’s actually a story that predates its source material.

Advertisement

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiVWh0dHBzOi8vdHYuYXZjbHViLmNvbS90aGUtcGFydHktb2YtZml2ZS1yZWJvb3QtbWF5LWJlLXRpbWVseS1idXQtaXRzLXN0b3J5LTE4NDA4MzYwMjfSAVlodHRwczovL3R2LmF2Y2x1Yi5jb20vdGhlLXBhcnR5LW9mLWZpdmUtcmVib290LW1heS1iZS10aW1lbHktYnV0LWl0cy1zdG9yeS0xODQwODM2MDI3L2FtcA?oc=5

2020-01-08 14:00:00Z
52780543078942

Harvey Weinstein trial: Jury selection gets underway in New York as he faces new charges in Los Angeles - CBS News

New York Times correspondent and CBS News contributor Jodi Kantor, who won a Pulitzer Prize for breaking the news about Weinstein, said the new sex crime charges announced Monday in Los Angeles are "an incredibly dramatic development."

"Weinstein is essentially now fighting charges on two fronts," Kantor told "CBS This Morning" on Tuesday. "The prosecutors are basically accusing him of hurting women day after day in L.A. And, remember that as jury selection starts in New York, the New York jury may know about what he's accused of doing in Los Angeles."

Kantor said the two cases could affect each other in unpredictable ways.

"First of all, there's a woman who's involved in both cases," Kantor said. "There are only two women at the basis of the New York charges, but the prosecutors can call other witnesses. One of those witnesses is also at the center of the L.A. allegations."

Showing a pattern with the other witnesses' testimony could be devastating for Weinstein's case, Kantor said.

"The nature of the Harvey Weinstein allegations is these women who are strangers to one another, who didn't know each other, they're telling very similar stories about the same man over and over again," Kantor said. "That's really powerful." 

But, according to Kantor, Weinstein's defense team does have at least one thing on their side.

"The jury has to be unanimous to convict," Kantor said. "When is the last time that 12 people you know agreed on these really complicated matters about sex and power? So they may be able to create some doubt about exactly what happened and about consent in the jury's mind."

Read more

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiiwFodHRwczovL3d3dy5jYnNuZXdzLmNvbS9saXZlLXVwZGF0ZXMvaGFydmV5LXdlaW5zdGVpbi10cmlhbC1qdXJ5LXNlbGVjdGlvbi1nZXRzLXVuZGVyd2F5LWluLW5ldy15b3JrLW5ldy1jaGFyZ2VzLWluLWxvcy1hbmdlbGVzLTIwMjAtMDEtMDgv0gGPAWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNic25ld3MuY29tL2FtcC9saXZlLXVwZGF0ZXMvaGFydmV5LXdlaW5zdGVpbi10cmlhbC1qdXJ5LXNlbGVjdGlvbi1nZXRzLXVuZGVyd2F5LWluLW5ldy15b3JrLW5ldy1jaGFyZ2VzLWluLWxvcy1hbmdlbGVzLTIwMjAtMDEtMDgv?oc=5

2020-01-08 13:55:00Z
52780535523620

The Sad Way Prince Harry and Prince William's Rift Is Impacting Their Children - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Prince William and Prince Harry have had a difficult year. After Prince Harry and Meghan Markle stepped out and established their own household, separate from that of Prince William and Kate Middleton, numerous reports claimed that the brothers were at odds and are now not nearly as close as they used to be.

This is compounded by the fact that they are rarely seen together when they used to be inseparable. Still, a new report reveals that Duchess Kate definitely wants the two to start patching things up, if only for the sake of the children.

How did the royal rift start?

Meghan Markle visits Canada House with Prince Harry.
Meghan Markle | DANIEL LEAL-OLIVAS – WPA Pool/Getty Images

When Duchess Meghan joined the royal family in early 2018, rumors immediately started regarding the nature of her relationship with Duchess Kate. While many assumed that the two women didn’t get along, it seems as though the real story was the rift between Prince William and Prince Harry.

Royal sources claimed that the brothers were each on their own paths in life and that they had little in common anymore. A few months after Markle and Prince Harry got married, they announced that they would be separating households from Prince William and Duchess Kate, and re-established themselves in a quieter, more remote area of England.

After welcoming their son, Archie Harrison, in May 2019, they became even more reclusive. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex kept their son’s baptism a private affair and allowing only a few photos of the baby to be released. 

How many kids do Prince William and Kate Middleton have?

Prince William and Duchess Kate are no strangers to balancing the press with the hard work of parenthood. They have three children in total: Prince George, born in July 2013, Princess Charlotte, born in May 2015, and their youngest child, Prince Louis, born in April 2018.

While rumors persist that the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge could be planning for a fourth child, they have not yet announced anything.

Since the birth of Archie Harrison this past May, he has only been spotted on one or two playdates with Duchess Kate and Prince William’s children. Although some sources have insisted that Markle turned to Middleton for parenting advice after the birth of her son, sadly, the royal cousins do not seem to spend a great deal of time together.

Do Prince Harry and Meghan Markle want more children?

Whether or not Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan eventually have another baby remains to be seen. On one hand, Prince Harry spoke out in 2019, stating that they want “no more than two” children due to the potential for negative effects on the environment.

Still, the two are known to love kids and it is very possible that they want to give Archie Harrison a sibling. Some sources have speculated that they will probably announce a pregnancy in 2021, in order to allow for a bit of a gap in between children.

This would likely be a healthier thing to do. Although since Duchess Meghan is past 35, and is considered to be of advanced maternal age, the possibility of complications become greater the longer they wait. 

Kate Middleton is hoping the brothers reconnect

No matter how many children the royal couples end up welcoming, it seems as though Duchess Kate might have finally had enough of the rift. In a recent report, sources close to the royal family claim that Middleton has one major hope for 2020: that the royal cousins get to spend more time together.

The source noted that Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan chose to spend the holiday season separately from the royal family, heading to Canada for a retreat from the spotlight. It is certainly possible that Prince Harry and Markle decide to change up their mindset in the new year and spend a great deal more time around Middleton, Prince William, and their kids.

Still, they have proven to be a bit unpredictable in the past, so only time will tell.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMifGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNoZWF0c2hlZXQuY29tL2VudGVydGFpbm1lbnQvdGhlLXNhZC13YXktcHJpbmNlLWhhcnJ5LWFuZC1wcmluY2Utd2lsbGlhbXMtcmlmdC1pcy1pbXBhY3RpbmctdGhlaXItY2hpbGRyZW4uaHRtbC_SAQA?oc=5

2020-01-08 09:59:17Z
52780542675596

Duke and Duchess of Sussex drop by Canada House in London to thank officials for hospitality - CNN

The Duke and Duchess recently returned from Canada, where they spent the Christmas holidays with the Duchess' mother, Doria Ragland.
They were met at Canada House by Janice Charette, the high commissioner for Canada in the United Kingdom.
Prince Harry and  Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, view a special exhibition of art by indigenous Canadian artist Skawennati.
"The Duke and Duchess have a strong connection to Canada. It's a country The Duke of Sussex has visited many times over the years and it was also home to The Duchess for seven years before she became a member of The Royal Family," the royals said on their Instagram page, Sussex Royal.
The Duke and Duchess posted a video of their tour, which included seeing exhibits and meeting the staff.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiVGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNubi5jb20vMjAyMC8wMS8wNy91ay9kdWtlLWFuZC1kdWNoZXNzLW9mLXN1c3NleC1jYW5hZGEtaG91c2UvaW5kZXguaHRtbNIBWGh0dHBzOi8vYW1wLmNubi5jb20vY25uLzIwMjAvMDEvMDcvdWsvZHVrZS1hbmQtZHVjaGVzcy1vZi1zdXNzZXgtY2FuYWRhLWhvdXNlL2luZGV4Lmh0bWw?oc=5

2020-01-08 05:12:00Z
52780542675596

Selasa, 07 Januari 2020

Weinstein Judge Denies Request to Delay New York Trial After L.A. Indictment - Hollywood Reporter

Judge Burke denied the motion, arguing that the new charges are "next to meaningless" as far as Weinstein's criminal case in New York is concerned.

On Tuesday morning, Judge James M. Burke denied a request from Harvey Weinstein’s legal team to delay his criminal trial in New York County “with a cooling off period” after the former movie mogul was indicted on new charges in Los Angeles County on Monday.

Attorney Arthur Aidala argued that it would be impossible to select a "fair and impartial" panel of jurors after the widespread coverage of Weinstein’s new indictment.

"It is the talk of the town, at this very moment," Aidala said, holding up copies of national newspapers that printed front-page coverage of the charges. "Don’t we need a cooling-off period? Don’t we at least need a period of time so there are other things in the news?" (Weinstein's legal team also suggested that the New York District Attorney's office was in cahoots with L.A. and that these new charges were timed to help the prosecution.)

But the judge immediately denied the motion to adjourn, arguing that the new charges are "next to meaningless" as far as Weinstein's criminal case in New York is concerned.

"The jury knows and will be instructed that being arrested or charged or indicted for a felony is in and of itself meaningless," he said. "If you want to explore the L.A. charges on your voir dire, you may of course do so."

The judge also said he would consider a request to present the jury — once selected — with instructions related to the case.

In light of the new charges, lead prosecutor Joan Illuzzi-Orbon asked the judge to revoke Weinstein's bail agreement and have him remanded, a motion that was also rejected.

Manhattan Assistant District Attorney argued that Weinstein now faces a more perilous situation and could try to flee. "It would ensure that the defendant is here in court and answering to the charges of bar," Illuzzi-Orbon told the judge. "We know that the defendant is a man of great means. He travels back and forth across the country privately. He has enormous amounts of real estate. So, judge, there is a grave risk that this defendant at some point will realize that the evidence against him is imposing and overwhelming and look to not only what this means for him, but the fact that across the country the same thing will happen to him."

Tuesday's court session, the second of the trial, began with the judge lambasting Weinstein's team after their client was caught using his cellphone after the judge had warned them — particularly Aidala — about the consequences of another such infraction.

"Put it away, now," a court officer had yelled at Weinstein shortly before the judge entered the courtroom.

"There is an issue, it’s an ongoing issue, it’s been an issue every single court date," the judge told Weinstein's team, as Weinstein himself repeatedly shook his head. "Mr. Weinstein, I could not implore you more to not answer the following question: Is this really the way you want to end up in jail for the rest of your life, by texting in violation of an order? Is it?"

But the judge decided against revoking Weinstein's bail, giving his team another stern warning instead. 

As for the timeline of the case, the court will begin seating jury panels of 120 people Tuesday morning, with open court voir dire processions scheduled to start next Thursday, Jan. 16.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMicGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmhvbGx5d29vZHJlcG9ydGVyLmNvbS9uZXdzL3dlaW5zdGVpbi1qdWRnZS1kZW5pZXMtcmVxdWVzdC1kZWxheS1uZXcteW9yay10cmlhbC1sYS1pbmRpY3RtZW50LTEyNjc1MjPSAXRodHRwczovL3d3dy5ob2xseXdvb2RyZXBvcnRlci5jb20vYW1wL25ld3Mvd2VpbnN0ZWluLWp1ZGdlLWRlbmllcy1yZXF1ZXN0LWRlbGF5LW5ldy15b3JrLXRyaWFsLWxhLWluZGljdG1lbnQtMTI2NzUyMw?oc=5

2020-01-07 15:29:33Z
52780535523620

Rep. Crenshaw applauds Ricky Gervais' takedown of Hollywood elites: 'He has the support of the people' - Fox News

Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas., on Tuesday defended comedian Ricky Gervais' incendiary jokes that made fun of Hollywood celebrities' political grandstanding and went viral on social media.

“Ricky has done a much deeper and more important service to our country than just making us laugh. He’s illuminating their hypocrisy in a way that they might actually change because how many of those actors made some annoying political speech after that,” Crenshaw told “Fox & Friends,” noting that Gervais had the "support of the people."

RICKY GERVAIS' FIERY GOLDEN GLOBES MONOLOGUE SLAMMING HOLLYWOOD DOWNPLAYED, IGNORED BY MUCH OF MEDIA

Golden Globes host Gervais did not get the warmest reception from the mainstream media after his fiery monologue that took direct aim at Hollywood went ablaze on social media.

"You’re in no position to lecture the public about anything," Gervais declared during his monologue at the ceremony. "You know nothing about the real world. Most of you spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg."

The Washington Post offered a scathing review of Gervais' performance, declaring in its headline that "nobody cared" about his barbs against the A-listers in Tinseltown.

Hank Stuever, the Washington Post's TV critic, claimed Gervais' monologue was filled with "all-too-easy digs" at Felicity Huffman, Joe Pesci, Leonardo DiCaprio and Judy Dench.

Los Angeles Times TV critic Lorraine Ali was even more brutal with her review on the "snarky British comedian."

RICKY GERVAIS SAID HE HAD A 'BLAST' AT THE GOLDEN GLOBES: 'MAKE JOKES, NOT WAR'

"Forget the escapist magic of Hollywood," he wrote. "Nihilism was the name of the game when host Ricky Gervais opened the Golden Globes on Sunday night with a gloom-and-doom monologue so cynical it made the effervescent Tom Hanks scowl."

Ali suggested that Gervais should have been more political, pointing to President Trump's impeachment, the escalating conflict with Iran and ongoing wildfires in Australia.

Crenshaw said that if Americans can’t share politics and put an end to the culture war, then the country should start going back to sharing other things, such as movies and comedy.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“[Entertainment culture has] become divisive because it’s the fault of the Hollywood elites, because they go up on stage and they make divisive comments and they make fun of 50 percent of the population and they call it a right-wing talking point when they themselves are criticized,” Crenshaw said.

Fox News’ Joseph A. Wulfsohn contributed to this report.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiTmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZveG5ld3MuY29tL21lZGlhL2Rhbi1jcmVuc2hhdy1yaWNreS1nZXJ2YWlzLW1vY2tzLWhvbGx5d29vZC1lbGl0ZdIBUmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZveG5ld3MuY29tL21lZGlhL2Rhbi1jcmVuc2hhdy1yaWNreS1nZXJ2YWlzLW1vY2tzLWhvbGx5d29vZC1lbGl0ZS5hbXA?oc=5

2020-01-07 14:32:11Z
52780536649064

'Bachelor' Ignored Contestants To Focus On Hannah Brown And Sex - The Federalist

On Monday night’s season premiere of “The Bachelor,” the spotlight of the first episode was stolen from the 30 beautiful contestants and centralized around two topics: Hannah Brown and sex. This season follows Bachelor Peter Weber, better known as “Pilot Pete,” on his journey after coming as third runner-up in Brown’s season of “The Bachelorette.” The couple was best known for having sex in a windmill — four times.

While Bachelor Nation thought they were watching “The Bachelor,” the episode oddly started to feel like a rerun of “The Bachelorette.” At the beginning of the show, Weber was awestruck when Brown stepped out of a limo arriving at the Bachelor Mansion. Last season, when Weber arrived at the Bachelor Mansion for “The Bachelorette,” he handed Brown a pilot pin. Brown came back to return the pin, telling Weber to give it to the girl he falls in love with.

At first, it was an “aww, that’s cute” moment, perfectly wrapping up the previous Bachelorette season for Brown. But the moment was destroyed when Brown decided to make a second appearance in the same episode.

During the second “group date,” Weber and his chosen group of women entered a venue to find Brown standing on stage next to none other than — a windmill. She proceeded to tell all the women in the group about the time she had sex with Weber, in a windmill, four times.

After the incredibly awkward sex story was revealed, Brown announced that each women would get up in front of a live audience and tell her own sex story. While episode one did not showcase the women’s stories, it’s imminent that episode two will be filled with uncomfortable, personal bedroom stories.

The explicit talk of Weber’s sex life exemplifies how “The Bachelor” franchise has put a greater emphasis on sex in recent years. Netflix recently released the 2009 season of “The Bachelor” in which single-father Jason Mesnick falls in love with one woman. They get married, and have a family. It was the happy ending Bachelor fans wanted and still have 11 years later. Jason’s final choice, Mollie, is still his wife to this day.

In 2019, Bachelor Colton Underwood’s season focused almost explicitly on sex and the inability of many women to commit to Underwood. Allegedly, Underwood was a virgin at the beginning of the show and his virginity was discussed in virtually every episode.

In 2009, sex was a taboo subject on “The Bachelor,” but as the seasons progressed, so did the women who found it less and less taboo to discuss their sexual behavior on television. I can’t help but see a slight correlation between the uptick in sex talk and the inability of these reality TV stars to commit to each other.

During an episode that should have been all about getting to know the 30 contestants who came to California to meet Weber, the entirety of it was overshadowed by talk of sex in a windmill. It was disappointing to watch “The Bachelor” franchise cling to a previous relationship solely to discuss intimate moments on national television.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMicGh0dHBzOi8vdGhlZmVkZXJhbGlzdC5jb20vMjAyMC8wMS8wNy90aGUtYmFjaGVsb3ItcHJlbWllcmUtaWdub3JlZC1jb250ZXN0YW50cy10by1mb2N1cy1vbi1oYW5uYWgtYnJvd24tYW5kLXNleC_SAQA?oc=5

2020-01-07 12:01:24Z
52780540328175