Selasa, 17 Desember 2019

Mariah Carey didn't leave tip following $500 meal: source - Fox News

Mariah Carey and her team worked up quite an appetite when the diva played the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in Atlantic City, NJ, on her “All I Want for Christmas Is You” tour.

Spies said a production assistant from her tour was dispatched to Robert’s Steakhouse in the hotel to pick up nearly $500 in takeout the same night Carey performed.

Said a spy, “Chef Will Savarese prepared the meal with extra attention to make sure that everything was perfect for the notoriously finicky pop star, who performed her Christmas show at the Hard Rock where the top-tier restaurant is located.”

MARIAH CAREY'S 'ALL I WANT FOR CHRISTMAS IS YOU' DEEMED MOST ANNOYING CHRISTMAS SONG BY UK POLL

According to a receipt, the order included lobster tail, strip steak, roast chicken, salmon, crab cakes, pasta dishes, salads and spinach.

But a source said some servers rolled their eyes when the staffer handed over $500 in cash for the meal totaling $493.67 — but took back the $6.33 in change and didn’t leave a tip.

Either way, Carey performed at the sold-out show, which included Stockton University’s Highest Praise Gospel Choir.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Carey’s twins, Moroccan and Monroe, also made an appearance to perform “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer.”

This article originally appeared in the New York Post.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiVWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZveG5ld3MuY29tL2VudGVydGFpbm1lbnQvbWFyaWFoLWNhcmV5LWRpZG50LWxlYXZlLXRpcC1mb2xsb3dpbmctNTAwLW1lYWzSAVlodHRwczovL3d3dy5mb3huZXdzLmNvbS9lbnRlcnRhaW5tZW50L21hcmlhaC1jYXJleS1kaWRudC1sZWF2ZS10aXAtZm9sbG93aW5nLTUwMC1tZWFsLmFtcA?oc=5

2019-12-17 14:24:06Z
52780499969348

Star Wars fans, let's not be jerks about The Rise of Skywalker - CNET

starwars-skywalker

Don't go to the dark side, Star Wars fans.

Disney

The release of Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker is just days away. Perched at the culmination of a decades-long saga, it's logical to expect fans are going to have feelings. Excitement. Apprehension. Mild nausea from too much popcorn. All are valid. 

One emotion we all could probably live without? Rage. 

Guys. Listen to me. Whatever happens, let's be cool about this, OK? 

I get it. You're super invested in this whole franchise. The prequels didn't go so well. The Force Awakens was, well, a new hope of getting good Star Wars movies again. Now finally after four years, fans get to see how this entire storyline plays out. Will Rey's parents be revealed? Is Kylo Ren redeemable? Will I drown in a puddle of my own tears upon seeing Carrie Fisher? Like I said -- feelings.

Here's the problem: Fan response to 2017's The Last Jedi was kind of a shitshow, and it didn't have to be. That's why I'm bracing for impact this week but also imploring anyone who's apt to lose their mind if The Rise of Skywalker doesn't meet some specific set of expectations to just exercise some restraint. 

I'm not here to tell you Star Wars doesn't matter. Clearly, it does. Star Wars: A New Hope came out in 1977. The trilogy spawned books and comic books, TV series, video games, that one holiday special, theme parks and an obscene amount of merchandising. After Disney bought Lucasfilm in 2012, it only took six years to recoup its $4 billion investment. Money aside, the franchise has burrowed its way into pop culture, turning up on shows like 30 Rock and How I Met Your Mother; the Twitter account Death Star PR has more than 300,000 followers. The Beastie Boys referenced Luke and Darth Vader in the lyrics to "Do It." 

And if you like it, it matters. 

There's a tipping point, though. When The Last Jedi came out, pockets of the internet quickly resorted to their worst behavior. Director Rian Johnson got death threats. Actress Kelly Marie Tran incurred so much online harassment that she deleted her Instagram account. Mark Hamill had to come to her defense on Twitter saying, "What's not to love? #GetaLifeNerds" while tweeting a picture of the two of them together. Tran even told Good Morning America last week that she'd been to therapy in the wake of everything

Nothing is worth ginning up so much vitriol for the purpose of funneling it toward other human beings. 

What's more, it doesn't make much sense to introduce hate to a subject matter that you love. Boost those negative signals enough and Star Wars will cease to be something that's brought audiences so much joy and excitement -- it'll become something associated with a repellent toxicity. 

Don't spill your bile on the Millennium Falcon. Han would hate that. 

And let's be real: Palpatine would want you to send those angry tweets. It might sound flip, but it's worth remembering that the corrupting power of anger and hatred is like the central theme of every single Star Wars movie, and those to give into it are the bad guys

Now playing: Watch this: Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker - Official Trailer (2019)

2:20

I've covered online harassment and toxic fandom enough to know what drives some of this behavior. As mentioned earlier, a whole lot of people really love Star Wars, and some folks love it to an extent that it becomes inextricably linked to their identity. So when something, like The Last Jedi, doesn't turn out they way they want, it feels like a personal affront. It's not a personal affront. What it is is an impossible expectation that a multi-million dollar project housed under a giant media company is going to meet any given person's exact hopes and specifications. 

None of this is to say that you can't have a negative opinion about The Rise of Skywalker when it comes out. By all means, engage with the thing you love. Have your say. Dissect every scene. Just remember humans made it and they don't deserve to have their lives made miserable. Plus, the original three movies are still everything you want and need them to be.

So if you don't dig The Rise of Skywalker please remember: it's not the end of the galaxy -- the suns will continue to rise over Tatooine. 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiV2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNuZXQuY29tL25ld3Mvc3Rhci13YXJzLWZhbnMtbGV0cy1ub3QtYmUtamVya3MtYWJvdXQtdGhlLXJpc2Utb2Ytc2t5d2Fsa2VyL9IBYmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNuZXQuY29tL2dvb2dsZS1hbXAvbmV3cy9zdGFyLXdhcnMtZmFucy1sZXRzLW5vdC1iZS1qZXJrcy1hYm91dC10aGUtcmlzZS1vZi1za3l3YWxrZXIv?oc=5

2019-12-17 13:00:16Z
52780480060806

‘Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker’ First Reactions Are In and They’re Pretty Much What You’d Expect - TheWrap

(This post does not contain any spoilers for “Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker”)

We’re just a few days away now from the arrival of “Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker” in theaters everywhere, and that means the hype meter is already off the charts. And with the world premiere taking place Monday night in Hollywood, we’ve now got a whole bunch of people who have actually seen the thing.

And, of course, a lot of those people tweeted their reactions as soon as they got out of the theater. And, well, those reactions are mostly what you’d expect from people attending the premiere of a new “Star Wars” movie. For the most part, the responses are very positive, though some are less positive than others.

The reactions thus far have come in two main flavors: folks voicing overwhelmingly effusive praise for the film, and folks who say that the movie is a whole lot and they’re gonna have to think about it. It’s not extremely surprising that we’d get those types of responses at the premiere — it’s unlikely that anyone at the premiere would straight up trash the movie, so this is the range I personally expected.

We want to reiterate here that there are no spoilers in the tweets below — unless you consider “I liked it” or “I’m not sure how I feel” to constitute plot and story details. Now let’s get into it.

If all these tweets are getting you wound up with anticipation, don’t worry. “Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker” hits theaters on Thursday evening.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiWmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZXdyYXAuY29tL3N0YXItd2Fycy1lcGlzb2RlLWl4LXRoZS1yaXNlLW9mLXNreXdhbGtlci1maXJzdC1yZWFjdGlvbnMtYXJlLWluL9IBXmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZXdyYXAuY29tL3N0YXItd2Fycy1lcGlzb2RlLWl4LXRoZS1yaXNlLW9mLXNreXdhbGtlci1maXJzdC1yZWFjdGlvbnMtYXJlLWluL2FtcC8?oc=5

2019-12-17 10:40:00Z
52780480060806

‘Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker’: First Reactions from the World Premiere - Variety

Disney’s third and final film in the latest Star Wars trilogy, “The Rise of Skywalker,” had its world premiere Monday night in Los Angeles with audience members quickly taking to Twitter afterward to share their reactions.

The review embargo for “Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker” lifts on Wednesday, Dec. 18, at 12:01 a.m. PST. However, the social media embargo broke immediately after the premiere.

(No spoilers from the film ahead). 

Members of the press, including critics and reporters, had mostly mixed-to-positive reactions of J.J. Abrams and Lucasfilm’s final chapter in the Skywalker saga, which stars Daisy Ridley, Adam Driver, John Boyega and Oscar Isaac.

“‘Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker’ is certainly the most convoluted Star Wars,” Uproxx’s Mike Ryan wrote. “There is a lot I liked, but the first half gets so bogged down with exposition and new plot and doodads and beacons and transmitters, it feels like it should have been three movies on its own.”

Variety’s Adam B. Vary tweeted: “There’s so much movie in this movie. But its best moments are the quietest and most human.”

Popular on Variety

“The emotional highs are spectacular, and there are a lot of payoffs (some earned, some not). But some choices feel like an unnecessary course-correct from The Last Jedi and some just plain don’t make sense,” said Laura Prudom of IGN.

Meanwhile, other writers like Rob Keyes of Screen Rant were more enthused: “It’s an immensely satisfying and massive end to the saga. It somehow addresses issues, problematic characters, and most unanswered questions from The Force Awakens and The Last Jedi too.”

Erik Davis of Fandango was also feeling The Force: “Epic. All of it. #TheRiseofSkywalker is a terrific finale that is just stuffed with so much of everything. Action, adventure — answers!! — humor, heart, love, and grit.”

See more reactions below.

“Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker” opens nationwide Friday, Dec. 20.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiaWh0dHBzOi8vdmFyaWV0eS5jb20vMjAxOS9maWxtL25ld3Mvc3Rhci13YXJzLXJpc2Utb2Ytc2t5d2Fsa2VyLWZpcnN0LXJlYWN0aW9ucy13b3JsZC1wcmVtaWVyZS0xMjAzNDQ0Mzg5L9IBbWh0dHBzOi8vdmFyaWV0eS5jb20vMjAxOS9maWxtL25ld3Mvc3Rhci13YXJzLXJpc2Utb2Ytc2t5d2Fsa2VyLWZpcnN0LXJlYWN0aW9ucy13b3JsZC1wcmVtaWVyZS0xMjAzNDQ0Mzg5L2FtcC8?oc=5

2019-12-17 07:08:00Z
52780480060806

‘Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker’ First Reactions Are In and They’re Pretty Much What You’d Expect - TheWrap

(There are no spoilers in this post for “Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker”)

Hype levels are at critical now that we’re just a couple days away from “Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker” hitting theaters, and the week’s festivities kicked off Monday night when the film got its world premiere in Los Angeles.

Finally, those in attendance are out of the theater and tweeting their reactions, and, well, those reactions are mostly what you’d expect from people attending the premiere of a new “Star Wars” movie. For the most part, the responses are very positive, though some are less positive than others.

The reactions thus far have come in two main flavors: folks voicing overwhelmingly effusive praise for the film, and folks who say that the movie is a whole lot and they’re gonna have to think about it. It’s not extremely surprising that we’d get those types of responses at the premiere — it’s unlikely that anyone at the premiere would straight up trash the movie, so this is the range I personally expected.

We want to reiterate here that there are no spoilers in the tweets below — unless you consider “I liked it” or “I’m not sure how I feel” to constitute plot and story details. Now let’s get into it.

If all these tweets are getting you wound up with anticipation, don’t worry. “Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker” hits theaters on Thursday evening.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiT2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZXdyYXAuY29tL3N0YXItd2Fycy10aGUtcmlzZS1vZi1za3l3YWxrZXItZmlyc3QtcmVhY3Rpb25zLWFyZS1pbi_SAVNodHRwczovL3d3dy50aGV3cmFwLmNvbS9zdGFyLXdhcnMtdGhlLXJpc2Utb2Ytc2t5d2Fsa2VyLWZpcnN0LXJlYWN0aW9ucy1hcmUtaW4vYW1wLw?oc=5

2019-12-17 06:25:00Z
52780480060806

Senin, 16 Desember 2019

The Incredible, Indelible ‘Watchmen’ - The New York Times

Spoilers for the full season of HBO’s “Watchmen” follow:

“Now: We have a god to kill.”

It is a bold statement that Lady Trieu (Hong Chau) makes in the finale of HBO’s “Watchmen” — boldness being part of the job description for a comic-book mad genius. It is also a kind of mission statement for this daring, breathtaking series, which in one season took American history and pop mythology, dismantled it down to its smallest atoms and reconstructed it in a form that was familiar yet wholly new.

It’s hard to overstate how risky, how primed for disaster, was the challenge that the creator, Damon Lindelof, signed up for. First, to adapt a notoriously hard-to-adapt subversive superhero comic. Then to lovingly, impishly subvert that subversion, extending the story backward and forwards in time. To do all that while reframing the story as an antiracist pulp thriller, weighty without being pompous or exploitative. Oh — and could it also be electrifying and playful and fun?

Amazingly it could, culminating in “See How They Fly,” a mind-bending, gravity-defying finale that successfully landed this improbable airship.

Like a fine watch or a chicken’s egg, the symbols the finale returned to, this season was a marvel of self-contained engineering. It succeeded, first, in craft and performance, with visual invention and memorable work from Chau, Regina King, Jean Smart, Jeremy Irons, Louis Gossett Jr. and many others. It set up a domino chain of mysteries that the finale satisfyingly paid off.

But it also created something more: an urgent entertainment that was as unignorable as the pealing of an alarm bell.

Alan Moore, the creator of the graphic novel, did not endorse this project, any more than he has other adaptations of his work. Yet Lindelof’s approach — to honor it by taking it apart and questioning the appeal of masked avengers in the first place — was very much in the spirit of the original.

Reinventing “Watchmen” by making its subject white supremacy rather than the Cold War — not to mention making its hero Angela Abar (King), an avenging black police-ninja — also meshes with Moore’s critique of the superhero genre, as he put it in a 2016 interview.

“Save for a smattering of nonwhite characters (and nonwhite creators),” Moore said, “these books and these iconic characters are still very much white supremacist dreams of the master race. In fact, I think that a good argument can be made for D.W. Griffith’s ‘Birth of a Nation’ as the first American superhero movie, and the point of origin for all those capes and masks.”

Lindelof (who wisely assembled a diverse writers’ room for the job) made a form of that argument. Then he complicated it and recomplicated it.

One of the first things we see in “Watchmen” is not “Birth of a Nation” but its imagined silent-movie antithesis: “Trust in the Law!,” the story of the black Oklahoma marshal Bass Reeves, playing in a Tulsa movie theater that is about to burn in the white-terrorist massacre of 1921.

The boy sitting in that theater grows up to be Will Reeves (Gossett), who takes the marshal’s surname and becomes America’s first superhero, Hooded Justice, under cover of a lynching victim’s mask. His “origin story,” as he calls it in the finale, is horrific. Yet there’s also a heartbreaking optimism in the idea that this child would grow up with the trust — or at least furious determination — that the law might win out, even if it took a century.

The history and present of American racism figure directly in “Watchmen”: the use of nostalgia as a literal drug; the Seventh Kavalry’s resentment at being expected to “say sorry” for the “alleged” sins of the past; the circled-thumb-and-finger-to-forehead gesture of the racist secret society Cyclops, which resembles the real-life white-power appropriation of the “O.K.” symbol.

But “Watchmen” also asked: What if black people were among the ones wearing the masks? What if a black man — a black policeman — were the first masked hero? Why would he need to shield his identity, even more than Clark Kent? And would the subterfuge work so well that — as we saw on the show-within-a-show “American Hero Story” — later generations would assume he must have been a white man?

All this played out in the sixth episode, “This Extraordinary Being,” which reimagined the origin of Moore’s Hooded Justice, astonishingly taking that character’s symbols — the hood and the noose — and tying them to the dark history of lynching in such a way that it seemed as if that reading was always there, begging to be revealed.

The “Watchmen” endgame then one-upped this gambit, remaking perhaps the original comics’ most memorable character, Dr. Manhattan, revealed here not to be in exile on Mars but living incognito as Angela’s husband, Cal (Yahya Abdul-Mateen II).

The image itself, of an African American man as the azure Übermensch — as both black and blue, to quote Fats Waller — was a striking statement, reimagining the universe’s one superbeing like an icon out of Afrofuturistic art.

Now the show was asking: What does it mean to give god a black man’s face? What if the very people once left out of superhero stories have the greatest claim of all to their themes and ideals? Who has a greater stake in truth, justice and the American way — an exile from Krypton, or the black child who fled a ruined movie theater, yet didn’t forsake the words of Bass Reeves?

In the end, “Watchmen” returned to the subject of power: Who holds it, who can be trusted with it and what should be done with it.

Superpowers are obviously horrifying in the hands of evildoers; hence the story of the Seventh Kavalry trying to steal Dr. Manhattan’s power, the show’s most conventionally comic-book-villain plot.

But “Watchmen” is also suspicious of those, like Veidt and Lady Trieu, who want to use power to impose their idea of good on the world. That opposition — toxic hate and toxic idealism — is paralleled in the background, in the fictional, quasi-autocratic presidencies of Richard Nixon and Robert Redford.

But dispassionate withdrawal, as represented by Dr. Manhattan’s retreat from the world, is no answer either. “He was a good man,” Will says. “But considering what he could do, he could have done more.”

Can anybody be trusted with absolute power? Can it ever be employed in a way that won’t create new and greater problems? “Watchmen” doesn’t answer these questions. But by ending with the suggestion that Dr. Manhattan could transfer his powers to Angela (incubated, like a vaccine, in a raw egg), it offers a suggestion as to who might be the best kind of person to entrust power to.

Maybe, the ending suggests, someone who didn’t ask for it. Maybe someone who has watched god and her only love die simultaneously. Maybe a black woman who has swallowed the memories of a century of injustice and persecution and struggle, who has (through an egg and a pill) literally taken into her body both the ultimate power and the ultimate understanding of powerlessness.

We are left, to wonder what Angela will do and should do from here. In a quintessentially Lindelof move, the screen cuts to black the instant that Angela’s sole touches the surface of her swimming pool, to test whether she can, like Dr. Manhattan, walk on water.

It’s tempting to call this a “cliffhanger” though I have no reason to believe the show intends to resolve it. You could call it a “tease,” but I don’t think that’s the spirit of it at all.

Instead, “Watchmen” leaves us at the electric moment of transformation — the precise instant when foot meets water, flesh meets the elemental, mortality meets immortality.

God is dead. Long may she live.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiR2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lm55dGltZXMuY29tLzIwMTkvMTIvMTYvYXJ0cy90ZWxldmlzaW9uL3dhdGNobWVuLWZpbmFsZS5odG1s0gFLaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cubnl0aW1lcy5jb20vMjAxOS8xMi8xNi9hcnRzL3RlbGV2aXNpb24vd2F0Y2htZW4tZmluYWxlLmFtcC5odG1s?oc=5

2019-12-16 14:17:00Z
52780499979655

'Jumanji' Sequel Takes Box Office Might To 'The Next Level' - HuffPost

HuffPost is now part of the Verizon Media family. We (Verizon Media) and our partners need your consent to access your device, set cookies, and use your data, including your location, to understand your interests, provide relevant ads and measure their effectiveness. Verizon Media will also provide relevant ads to you on our partners' products. Learn More

How Verizon Media and our partners bring you better ad experiences

To give you a better overall experience, we want to provide relevant ads that are more useful to you. For example, when you search for a film, we use your search information and location to show the most relevant cinemas near you. We also use this information to show you ads for similar films you may like in the future. Like Verizon Media, our partners may also show you ads that they think match your interests.

Learn more about how Verizon Media collects and uses data and how our partners collect and use data.

Select 'OK' to allow Verizon Media and our partners to use your data, or 'Manage options' to review our partners and your choices. Tip: Sign In to save these choices and avoid repeating this across devices. You can always update your preferences in the Privacy Centre.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiYWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lmh1ZmZwb3N0LmNvbS9lbnRyeS9qdW1hbmppLXRoZS1uZXh0LWxldmVsLWJveC1vZmZpY2UtZGVidXRfbl81ZGNlNDJmNWU0YjBkMmU3OWY4YTMyM2XSAT9odHRwczovL20uaHVmZnBvc3QuY29tL3VzL2VudHJ5L3VzXzVkY2U0MmY1ZTRiMGQyZTc5ZjhhMzIzZS9hbXA?oc=5

2019-12-16 07:17:00Z
52780487637246