On Saturday, the couple said their “I dos” at the San Ysidro Ranch in Montecito, California, where they were joined by family and close friends, US Weekly confirmed.
Pratt, 39, and Schwarzenegger, 29, began dating in June 2018 after her mother, Maria Shriver, reportedly introduced the pair.
“Sweet Katherine, so happy you said yes! I’m thrilled to be marrying you. Proud to live boldly in faith with you. Here we go,” the “Guardians of The Galaxy” actor captioned a sweet photo of them hugging while showing off her massive engagement ring.
Shriver also congratulated the couple on their engagement at the time, writing on social media, “Congratulations to two loving, kind, caring, thoughtful, spiritual people. We are so happy for you. You are blessed, as is everyone who knows you. Yes, let’s go.” Katherine’s famous dad Arnold Schwarzenegger also offered his blessing.
Pratt was previously married to actress Anna Faris. The couple announced their split in 2017 after eight years of marriage. They share one son together, 6-year-old Jack.
Proving the co-parents are still on good terms following their split, Faris commented on Pratt’s engagement, “I’m so happy for you both!! Congratulations!”
Reps for Pratt and Schwarzenegger did not immediately return our request for comment.
Congratulations are most definitely in order as Chris Pratt and Katherine Schwarzenegger have officially tied the knot.
The Guardians of the Galaxy actor wed Arnold Schwarzenegger's daughter on Saturday June 8, 2019 at the exclusive San Ysidro Ranch in California. The Daily Mail is reporting that Katherine was walked down the aisle by her famous father, while mother Maria Shriver can be seen greeting guests in multiple photos over on the site.
Pratt's son, Jack, from his marriage to Anna Faris was spotted at the fairytale nuptials. The Daily Mail is also reporting that Faris was apparently present for the big day, though this is unconfirmed.
Pratt and Schwarzenegger were seen riding on a golf buggy around the San Ysidro Ranch. The bride wore a gorgeous white dress with an impressive train:
Splash News
Actor Rob Lowe shared two photos on Instagram, of his wife and two sons ready for the event:
Meanwhile, a source told People, "You can tell today is the happiest day for Katherine. She hasn’t stopped smiling. And Chris seems giddy with excitement." The source continued, "The venue is beautiful. Lots of flowers and greenery everywhere. It’s a very romantic setting for a wedding."
The former Everwood actor confirmed his engagement via Instagram in January 2019, by sharing an adorable photo taken with his now-wife. Pratt wrote, "Sweet Katherine, so happy you said yes! I’m thrilled to be marrying you. Proud to live boldly in faith with you. Here we go! 💍🙏♥️":
Meghan Markle is often dragged through the media for being a “social climber.” Now, some people are saying Kate Middleton is the bigger social climber.
Why do fans of the royal family feel the need to argue over which duchess is better? Supporting women should mean supporting all women, but let’s take a look at their argument. Is Kate Middleton really a social climber? Does it even matter?
How Kate Middleton and Prince William met
Kate Middleton | Samir Hussein/WireImage
Kate met Prince William when they were both attending St. Andrews University. The pair were introduced through mutual friends, but the magic didn’t happen until William saw Kate walk down the runway in a charity fashion show. Kate wore a see-through, black mesh dress. The prince turned toward his friend and whispered, “Wow, Kate’s Hot!” From that point on, he began to pursue her.
Why some say Kate Middleton is a ‘social climber’
In a video circling Twitter, royal commentator Elaine Lui- who many in the comments claim is a known Meghan supporter, claims Kate is the real ‘social climber.’ “If we’re talking about royal social climbing, it’s not just Meghan Markle,” she said, before launching into a long list of reasons why Kate pursued William.
Most of what she said is unverified, like claiming Kate switched schools to get closer to the prince and then stopped hanging out with her “common” friends. Kate did change schools, but we don’t know her reasoning. And many say the timing just doesn’t add up. Kate would have had to make her final school decision before the palace announced which school William would be attending.
The claim that she doesn’t spend time with people outside the royal circle is false as well. Kate has a large group of friends, many who she has known since school.
Why the whole ‘social climber’ argument is silly
It doesn’t appear that Kate spent a whole bunch of her time pursuing William. She probably did find him attractive — who can blame her for that — but she didn’t follow him around like many of the other girls did. It wasn’t until William began pursuing her that their romantic relationship began.
Even so, what if Kate had been the one to pursue William? Would that really be such a big deal? Many women make the first move in a relationship, and we usually don’t bat an eye. Some say it’s because she wanted to be a part of the royal family, but many people are attracted to power- it’s human nature. Especially for a woman to be attracted to a powerful man. That’s biology.
Nobody forced Prince William to marry Kate
So what if Kate was first attracted to William because he was the prince? She didn’t force him to marry her. They have to truly care about each other to make it through the ups and downs of a relationship. It may have started from an attraction to royalty, but you can’t build a successful relationship on that.
Kate has been married to William for eight years and they have three children, yet they still seem very happy. If all Kate wanted was to be a part of royalty, she would have grown sick of it by now. With all the pressure that public life brings, we would see some cracks. The same goes for Meghan. It shouldn’t matter who started the relationship. It really doesn’t matter if Kate or Meghan is a social climber, (we think they’re not) but, it doesn’t make a difference in the long run. They’re happy with their husbands, and that’s all that counts.
Fox411: Actress Pauley Perrette confirmed she is leaving 'NCIS' after playing forensic scientist Abby Sciuto for 16 years. Adding on social media 'NO MY NETWORK AND SHOW ARE NOT MAD AT ME!'
The actress, 50, took to Twitter on Friday to explain to her followers that she is "not coming back" to the CBS procedural drama "ever," claiming she is "terrified" of former co-star Mark Harmon.
“NO I AM NOT COMING BACK! EVER! (Please stop asking?),” she wrote before alleging: “I am terrified of Harmon and him attacking me. I have nightmares about it."
As previously reported, days after her character forensic scientist Abby Sciuto's final appearance on the beloved procedural, Perrette released a series of ominous tweets. In them, she alleged abuse on the set that she claimed was being covered up by a “machine” run by “a very rich, very powerful” publicity entity.
WARNING: GRAPHIC IMAGES BELOW
On Friday, Perrette posted pictures of an individual -- who she claims was her crew member on "NCIS" -- with a bruised eye and stitches.
"You think I didn’t expect blow back? You got me wrong. THIS happened To my crew member and I fought like hell to keep it from happening again! To protect my crew!" she wrote alongside the photos, before alleging: "And then I was physically assaulted for saying NO!?and I lost my job."
Although Perrette did not share when the alleged assault happened, last May The Wrap reported that in 2016 a crew member was bitten by Harmon's dog, which ultimately required stitches. According to the outlet, citing sources, the actress "objected when the dog was allowed to return" to set following the incident and "the tension between the two stars" became "bad."
In a statement to Fox News from CBS at the time, the television studio said: “Pauley Perrette had a terrific run on ‘NCIS’ and we are all going to miss her. Over a year ago, Pauley came to us with a workplace concern. We took the matter seriously and worked with her to find a resolution. We are committed to a safe work environment on all our shows."
In response, Perrette took to Twitter to thank CBS for its statement, indicating that it wasn't to blame for her assault allegations.
"I want to thank my studio and network CBS They have always been so good to me and always had my back," she wrote.
At the time, CBS would not comment on any follow-up questions about the nature of the workplace complaint or exactly what kind of resolution was met.
Fox News' Julius Young and Tyler McCarthy contributed to this report.
Phoenix (Sophie Turner) can’t deal with compounding disappointments of the X-franchise
Don’t they have any healing and creative rejuvenation among the super-powered mutations at Charles Xavier’s School for Gifted Children? If so, they needed them to lay their hands on this franchise for a few years before making another bungled attempt at the beloved Dark Phoenix storyline (from the 1980 comic books). But that’s a rhetorical question. If Dark Phoenix (2019) is any indication, mutations cannot save this franchise.
When we return to our characters, much has changed since the last visit. Which is fine since who wants to be reminded of X-Men Apocalypse? The X-Men are now no longer shunned by society but held up as heroes. Professor Xavier (James McAvoy, phoning this one in… but then who isn’t?) has a direct phone to the White House, like a Batman / Commissioner Gordon sitch gone national.
Matchy-matchy costumes for better PR
Their first mission, which serves as kind of a second prologue to the over and underwritten film, involves saving a space shuttle crew from imminent death. For underwritten/performed reason this is making Raven (Jessica Lawrence) nervous. The mission goes wrong with Jean Grey (Sophie Turner) appearing to explode with the doomed ship. But what’s this — she feels great with not a scratch on her? Well, not so fast. Her power is now off the charts and mental inhibitors that Xavier had placed on her as a child without her knowledge (uh-oh) have distintegrated as well. Her powers going haywire is bad enough for the team, but things get worse when super-powered mysterious aliens arrive on Earth (led by Jessica Chastain, going Terminator-franchise minimalist though she’s not playing a robot). The aliens intend to use Jean Grey, now nicknamed Phoenix for her remarkable resurrection, for their own nefarious purposes.
Quicksilver vs Phoenix. Everyone gets a turn against her. Guess who wins?
To be fair, Dark Phoenix does deliver a few meager thrills. The film makes you wait for Magneto and it’s wonderful to see Michael Fassbender’s effortlessly intense charisma back onscreen (where’s he been since marrying Alicia Vikander? That’s a long honeymoon). He clearly doesn’t want to be there, but then, neither does his character so it works. Disco-era mutant Dazzler gets a cameo which is irrelevant to the plot but still works as fan service (we never thought we’d see her onscreen!). Nightcrawler’s (Kodi Smit McPhee) teleportation skills are put to visually strong use, primarily because they look so different than everyone else’s computer generated gifts. A climactic action sequence on a speeding train goes on twice as long as it should and is too chaotic to follow well but it has two action-bliss jolts within if you’re patient about waiting for them.
What doesn’t work? Everything else.
Sophie Turner and Jessica Chastain briefly unite but to what end?
The franchise has never done right by Cyclops (Tye Sheridan now, James Marsden earlier) or Storm (Alexandra Shipp now, Halle Berry then) and that continues here, with no effort to course correct. [SPOILER] And for a story that should feel apocalyptically large on an existential level, there is only one major death, and that one plays like it’s appeasing someone who was chafing against their endless contract. [/SPOILER] Stranger still given the budgets on superhero movies, it’s visually “small,” as if the X-Men and the aliens are the only people who exist in the known universe. One action sequence takes place in the suburbs but nobody appears to be at home. Another takes place in a single block of a city but feels no bigger than an unruly block party. Someone called the cops.
It’s all terribly unsatisfying.
Sophie Turner does what she can with her undermotivated central part, but there’s no magic in the performance to save the movie from itself. The X-Men movies originally leaned hard into allegory “mutants = persecuted minorities. Hatred is bad!” but this one barely knows what to do with something that should be easily resonant and message-movie flexible like losing control of your body or giving yourself over to rage.
Michael Fassbender, werking a metal collar.
The other actors have much less to do, only repeating beats we’ve seen them do multiple times before. The franchise is in a time loop after all, returning to this story again with different actors playing the same roles, but not, through the usual reboot format. It’s little wonder that everyone is merely going through the motions between “action” and “cut”.
We repeat: Mutations cannot save the X-Men. No half-measure cast changes or director swaps will do. Dark Phoenix is not, perhaps, the worst movie in the franchise, just the dullest. But when more movies from a franchise are fighting for Worst Of honors than Best Of, it’s time to bury it.
It’s their funeral since Disney bought Fox, so this is the last non Marvel Studios, X-Men movies
Logan knew that, somehow, and went to the grave honorably. Dark Phoenix tries to follow suit, in its own funereal way, but without that earlier film’s conviction, genre-twisting, and fine performances. Dark Phoenix strays wildly from the famous 1980 comic book storyline but still honors its downer outcome. It’s a bummer… intentionally and otherwise.
EA and Respawn Entertainment have already shared a trailer for the upcoming game Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order offering us some cool cinematic footage and story details. Today we have a new trailer to share with you and it puts a focus on the impressive gameplay action that the game will feature.
I was already sold on the game thanks to the first trailer, but this new one is definitely getting me way more excited to play the game! It looks awesome! I’ll let the footage speak for itself.
The player will control a character named Cal Kestis who is a Jedi padawan that survived Order 66. Cal had been hiding from the Empire the best he could to ensure his survival. But, they eventually catch up with him and if forced to survive as the Inquisition hunts him down. As you’ll see, Forest Whitaker’s character Saw Gerrera also appears in the game. And, of course, there’s also a new droid.
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order is an action-adventure game set after Star Wars: Episode III — Revenge of the Sith. Develop your Force abilities, hone your lightsaber techniques, and explore the ancient mysteries of a long-lost civilization—all while staying one step ahead of the Empire and its deadly Inquisitors.
Jedi: Fallen Order will be available on PC, PS4, and Xbox One on November 15th, 2019.
