Selasa, 04 Juni 2019
Professional sports gambler James Holzhauer's "Jeopardy!" winning streak ends - CBS News
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uzSkEjO7TA
2019-06-04 15:11:48Z
CCAiCzV1elNrRWpPN1RBmAEB
Why 'Jeopardy!' champ James Holzhauer made a low wager on his losing night - Fox News
When James Holzhauer made a relatively low wager in the Final Jeopardy round on Monday night's episode of "Jeopardy!," it left a lot of viewers scratching their heads — but "Jeopardy!" experts say that the professional gambler's bet was the best he could have made given the circumstances.
Holzhauer bet just $1,399 in Final Jeopardy, leading even Alex Trebek to remark at the unusually low number, but Brad Rutter, the all-time leader in "Jeopardy!" winnings, told the Washington Post that it was actually the absolute best way for Holzhauer to win during Monday's game.
Holzhauer had $23,400 leading into Final Jeopardy, with Emma Boettcher in first place with $26,600 and third place contestant Jay Sexton with $11,000. Rutter explained that Holzhauer's only chance at victory would be if Boettcher guessed the Final Jeopardy question incorrectly and Holzhauer guessed correctly.
'JEOPARDY!' STAR TELLS LAS VEGAS CROWD HE CREDITS WINNING STREAK TO HIS GAMBLING SKILLS
'JEOPARDY!' HOST ALEX TREBEK GIVES 'MIND-BOGGLING' CANCER UPDATE
If Boettcher, who wagered $20,201, guessed incorrectly, she would have $6,399 remaining. Holzhauer, if he guessed correctly in that scenario, would have won with $24,799. In the off chance that Sexton answered correctly while Boettcher and Holzhauer each guessed incorrectly, he could have won. As a result, Holzhauer made a bet that would have had him leave with $1 more than Sexton's maximum potential winnings of $22,000, Rutter noted.
If Holzhauer had bet everything and Boettcher guessed the Final Jeopardy question correctly, Boettcher would have still won.
'JEOPARDY!' LOSES TOP RATINGS SPOT TO 'JUDGE JUDY' WITHOUT JAMES HOLZHAUER
Holzhauer explained to Action Network that Rutter's analysis was correct.
“I knew I could only win if Emma missed Final Jeopardy, as there was no way she wouldn’t bet to cover my all-in bet, so my only concern was getting overtaken by third place, and I bet just enough to make sure of locking him out," he said. "Betting big would have looked good for the cameras, but now I turn my straight bet (Emma misses) into a parlay (Emma misses, and I get it right).”
'JEOPARDY!' BEATS 'JUDGE JUDY' IN RATINGS BATTLE THANKS TO JAMES HOLZHAUER
Holzhauer wasn't too broken up about the loss. He told The Atlantic that he was resigned to his fate before it was sealed. “By the time Final Jeopardy rolled around, I knew my goose was cooked if Emma answered correctly. It’s a little like needing a team to miss a last-second field goal — nothing you can really do but watch," he said. "I made peace with my fate before the clue for Final was even revealed.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Holzhauer, who won 32 consecutive games before his defeat, finished his reign with $2,464,216, which includes the $2,000 he earned in his final game. That total comes short of the record set by "Jeopardy!" legend Ken Jennings, who earned $2,520,700 within 74 victories in 2004.
Fox News' Joseph A. Wulfsohn contributed to this report.
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/jeopardy-james-holzhauer-wager-loss
2019-06-04 12:53:07Z
CBMiSWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZveG5ld3MuY29tL2VudGVydGFpbm1lbnQvamVvcGFyZHktamFtZXMtaG9semhhdWVyLXdhZ2VyLWxvc3PSAQA
Why 'Jeopardy!' champ James Holzhauer made a low wager on his losing night - Fox News
When James Holzhauer made a relatively low wager in the Final Jeopardy round on Monday night's episode of "Jeopardy!," it left a lot of viewers scratching their heads — but "Jeopardy!" experts say that the professional gambler's bet was the best he could have made given the circumstances.
Holzhauer bet just $1,399 in Final Jeopardy, leading even Alex Trebek to remark at the unusually low number, but Brad Rutter, the all-time leader in "Jeopardy!" winnings, told the Washington Post that it was actually the absolute best way for Holzhauer to win during Monday's game.
Holzhauer had $23,400 leading into Final Jeopardy, with Emma Boettcher in first place with $26,600 and third place contestant Jay Sexton with $11,000. Rutter explained that Holzhauer's only chance at victory would be if Boettcher guessed the Final Jeopardy question incorrectly and Holzhauer guessed correctly.
'JEOPARDY!' STAR TELLS LAS VEGAS CROWD HE CREDITS WINNING STREAK TO HIS GAMBLING SKILLS
'JEOPARDY!' HOST ALEX TREBEK GIVES 'MIND-BOGGLING' CANCER UPDATE
If Boettcher, who wagered $20,201, guessed incorrectly, she would have $6,399 remaining. Holzhauer, if he guessed correctly in that scenario, would have won with $24,799. In the off chance that Sexton answered correctly while Boettcher and Holzhauer each guessed incorrectly, he could have won. As a result, Holzhauer made a bet that would have had him leave with $1 more than Sexton's maximum potential winnings of $22,000, Rutter noted.
If Holzhauer had bet everything and Boettcher guessed the Final Jeopardy question correctly, Boettcher would have still won.
'JEOPARDY!' LOSES TOP RATINGS SPOT TO 'JUDGE JUDY' WITHOUT JAMES HOLZHAUER
Holzhauer explained to Action Network that Rutter's analysis was correct.
“I knew I could only win if Emma missed Final Jeopardy, as there was no way she wouldn’t bet to cover my all-in bet, so my only concern was getting overtaken by third place, and I bet just enough to make sure of locking him out," he said. "Betting big would have looked good for the cameras, but now I turn my straight bet (Emma misses) into a parlay (Emma misses, and I get it right).”
'JEOPARDY!' BEATS 'JUDGE JUDY' IN RATINGS BATTLE THANKS TO JAMES HOLZHAUER
Holzhauer wasn't too broken up about the loss. He told The Atlantic that he was resigned to his fate before it was sealed. “By the time Final Jeopardy rolled around, I knew my goose was cooked if Emma answered correctly. It’s a little like needing a team to miss a last-second field goal — nothing you can really do but watch," he said. "I made peace with my fate before the clue for Final was even revealed.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Holzhauer, who won 32 consecutive games before his defeat, finished his reign with $2,464,216, which includes the $2,000 he earned in his final game. That total comes short of the record set by "Jeopardy!" legend Ken Jennings, who earned $2,520,700 within 74 victories in 2004.
Fox News' Joseph A. Wulfsohn contributed to this report.
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/jeopardy-james-holzhauer-wager-loss
2019-06-04 12:21:07Z
CBMiSWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZveG5ld3MuY29tL2VudGVydGFpbm1lbnQvamVvcGFyZHktamFtZXMtaG9semhhdWVyLXdhZ2VyLWxvc3PSAQA
CFDA Fashion Awards 2019: Jennifer Lopez and Barbie among winners - CNN
Written by Kristen Bateman, CNNNew York City
The pair were among a host of figures recognized by the Council of Fashion Designers of America (CFDA) at its annual awards, often known the "Oscars of the fashion world."
Jennifer Lopez and Tom Ford appear onstage at the CFDA Fashion Awards. Credit: Nicholas Hunt/Getty Images
"I loved fashion since I was little girl, growing up in the Bronx and to here and among all these designers and to be honored is just a dream," the singer and actress said on the red carpet, adding: "I'm wearing Ralph Lauren, a fellow Bronx native."
In a somewhat unusual turn, the Mattel doll Barbie received the CFDA's Board of Directors' Tribute Award for her influence on fashion -- as well as her esteemed designer collaborations -- over the last 60 years. Model and actor Yara Shahidi presented the award, with Barbie's official Instagram account posting a picture of the doll in a custom look by Diane von Furstenberg.
Von Furstenberg, chair of the CFDA, also made a splash at the awards by carrying a fake torch down the red carpet. The designer told guests that her dramatic entrance signified the passing of her duties to Tom Ford, who now takes over as organization's chair.
"I'm very excited to speak to the group and to try to inspire them to think about positive change," she told CNN, before taking her seat at the ceremony. "It's so needed."
Diane Von Furstenberg, who is standing aside as chair of the CFDA. Credit: Nicholas Hunt/Getty Images
Designer Brandon Maxwell took home one of the most coveted prizes of the night, being named womenswear designer of the year. The Texas native, who made headlines with Lady Gaga's show-stopping Met Gala outfits last month, has become a fixture on the New York fashion scene since launching his neatly tailored and feminine line in 2015.
"I'm here with my fiancé and my friends, and I'm just excited to even be invited into the room," the designer explained, adding: "I think in fashion, we're always looking forward and I'm just working on what's next for September right now."
A brief history of the red carpet
A total of 11 awards were presented at the ceremony Monday night. Other winners included Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen, who won a fifth CFDA Fashion Award in recent years for their brand, The Row. Emily Adams Bode was named emerging designer of the year, while Sarah Burton of Alexander McQueen was honored with the Valentino Garavani and Giancarlo Giammetti International Award.
And plenty of other fashion figures turned up to wow the red carpet. Gigi Hadid arrived in a gray Louis Vuitton suit with a pleated skirt alongside the brand's artistic director and award nominee Virgil Abloh. Ciara was among the last to arrive, wearing a black silk off-the-shoulder gown, with metallic embroidery, by Vera Wang.
"For me, it felt like life was coming full circle," she told CNN. "What launched my career was wearing the burkini, so then to shoot for (Sports Illustrated) and shatter so many perceptions and to be alongside women, who wear very little or nothing at all, felt just so incredible."
Scroll through the gallery above to see the best fashion from the red carpet. CNN's Cody McCloy, Mohammed Elshamy and Oscar Holland contributed to this report.
https://www.cnn.com/style/article/cfda-fashion-awards-2019/index.html
2019-06-04 12:08:53Z
52780308424398
Putin's Media Struggle to Deal With HBO's Chernobyl - The Moscow Times
It seems every major Russian media outlet had to chime in about the “Chernobyl” TV series by HBO. Although the foreign program airs only online to paying viewers, the show has become something of a national sensation in Russia where the pro-Kremlin media have launched a mini-crusade against it.
Komsomolskaya Pravda (KP), Russia’s most popular newspaper, raised suspicions that competitors of state-atomic center Rosatom were using the series to tarnish this country’s image as a nuclear power.
Argumenty i Fakty, a newspaper popular among the elderly, dismissed the show as “a caricature and not the truth.”
“The only things missing are the bears and accordions!” quipped Stanislav Natanzon, lead anchor of Rossiya 24, one the country’s main news channel. He pointed to shots showing modern storm windows on a building in Pripyat — that are only visible if you greatly enlarge the image — as evidence of shoddy filmmaking. However, critics of the series found fault with more than just minor details.
"The scientist Valery Legasov not only led the government’s response to the Chernobyl disaster, he was also openly critical of its management of the nuclear industry."
In his show, the Rossiya 24 anchor pointed out a major article published by KP, arguing that the HBO series was wrong to suggest that the Soviet authorities were afraid to admit their mistakes and that this reluctance led to terrible consequences.
Legasov’s article in the country’s leading newspaper, the anchor says, proves this was not the case, undermining one of the main theses of the show.
Unfortunately, however, state-controlled media often tries unmask one set of lies with the help of another. It is true that Legasov did write such an article for KP in 1987, but the editors didn’t like it and refused to publish the piece.
Legasov was at wits end by this time: the Academy of Sciences had rejected his ideas and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev had refused to award him the honorary title of Hero of Socialist Labor (although he did bestow it upon others who worked with Legasov in Chernobyl).
Following a meeting at the Academy of Sciences, Legasov hung himself. Two weeks after his death, KP reversed its decision and published Legasov’s article in 1988.
“Chernobyl” is relatively historically accurate and the filmmakers devote a great deal of attention to detail. Nonetheless, I expect that the airing of the final installment will spur a fresh wave of unfounded criticism.
Ultra pro-Soviet columnist Anatoly Vasserman offered what is probably the most candid of all the reviews leveled against the show: “If Anglo-Saxons film something about Russians,” he said, “it definitely will not correspond to the truth.”
In so saying, he spared himself the need to look for hidden storm windows or other historical inaccuracies. “Those people always get it wrong. ‘Nuff said.”
In fact, it has been a long time since even Russians made uncontroversial historical films about Russia. Against this backdrop, HBO’s “Chernobyl” does not look too bad. So why were the pro-Kremlin media opposed to it from the start?
It is an ordinary case of jealous resentment: “Only we have the right to talk about our history,” they say, “so don’t butt in.” However, the reception given “Chernobyl” says more about the critics than it does about the series.
Thanks to the HBO series, many of my peers now have a different view of the Chernobyl accident. Whereas most disaster films culminate with the central catastrophe, only the first episode in this series is devoted to the Chernobyl reactor explosion.
All the subsequent episodes focus on the harrowing and self-sacrificing struggle that the Soviet people waged against the consequences of the explosion. And it was these people who saved Europe — at the cost of their own lives and health.
Watching this series provides at least a passing understanding of the hardships they endured in the process.
Russia, however, does not honor these individuals as heroes who saved Europe.
Just go to the official Kremlin website to see how often President Vladimir Putin mentions the Chernobyl survivors — many of whom are still alive and suffer from a variety of radiation-induced illnesses.
Putin’s sole references to them occur on the major anniversaries of the Chernobyl accident. He last mentioned them in 2016, on the 30th anniversary of the disaster, and again in 2011, on the 25th anniversary.
As odd as it might sound, the clean-up effort after the Chernobyl accident was almost as important to Europe as the Allied victory in World War II.
What began as a day of solemnity and sorrow, Victory Day has since turned into a noisy holiday with military parades.
Russia will never celebrate the Chernobyl events as a holiday — and if leaders cannot turn it into a fete of national pride and greatness, then better to forget that it ever happened at all.
Still, an attempt will be made to put an entirely different spin on those events. Russia’s NTV channel has already announced that it is shooting its own “Chernobyl” series based on the premise that the CIA sent an agent to the Chernobyl zone to carry out acts of sabotage.
Russia, however, does not honor these individuals as heroes who saved Europe.
As justification for the story, the film’s director, Alexei Muradov, cited fringe conspiracy theorists: “One theory holds that Americans had infiltrated the Chernobyl nuclear power plant and many historians do not deny that, on the day of the explosion, an agent of the enemy’s intelligence services was present at the station.”
In place of a moving tribute to the heroic men and women who sacrificed everything to overcome the fallout from the Chernobyl disaster, Moscow gives us a thrilling detective film based on a conspiracy theory in which a KGB officer struggles to thwart American spies — the new villains in this national tragedy.
The fact that an American, not a Russian TV channel tells us about our own heroes is a source of shame that the pro-Kremlin media apparently cannot live down. And this is the real reason they find fault with HBO’s “Chernobyl” series.
The views expressed in opinion pieces do not necessarily reflect the position of The Moscow Times.
https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2019/06/04/putins-media-struggle-to-deal-with-hbos-chernobyl-a65866
2019-06-04 08:23:06Z
52780307739896
Beyonce's lioness Nala tells Simba to 'come home' in new 'Lion King' teaser, Twitter roars - USA TODAY
Bryan Alexander USA TODAY
Published 3:03 AM EDT Jun 4, 2019
Silence, jungle! Beyonce is speaking at last.
The Queen Bey revealed her lioness Nala's voice in "The Lion King" with a brief teaser trailer released Monday. Beyonce had no comment on the footage, letting Nala do the talking for the live-action film (in theaters July 19).
In the teaser, Nala calls out to her childhood friend Simba (Donald Glover) to return to Pride Rock, now ruled by villainous Scar (Chiwetel Ejiofor).
."Simba, you have to take your place as king," Nala says. "We need you. Come home."
Seriously, who is going to say "no" to Beyonce? Simba's coming home.
The teaser gets a little heated at the local watering hole as grown lion Simba eyes the grown Nala. The teaser also shows Billy Eichner’s meerkat Timon and Seth Rogen’s warthog Pumbaa in a bit of comic relief.
Beyonce (and Blue Ivy!) go 'Lion King': Check out their roaring outfits
Twitter loved hearing from Beyonce.
"OK SIMBA NOW LET'S GET IN FORMATION #TheLionKing," Twitter user @simaemsima wrote, featuring a picture of Beyonce with a Nala head.
"Beyoncé has spoken. #TheLionKing," @canIbereel wrote.
"Did I get chills when I finally heard Beyoncé as Nala in #TheLionKing? Yes, yes I did," tweeted Entertainment Weekly's Alex Steinman.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movies/2019/06/03/beyonce-speaks-nala-lion-king-internet-roars/1333774001/
2019-06-04 07:03:26Z
52780307926319
Trump attends royal state banquet hosted by Queen Elizabeth II - Global News
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jOOtEg5TL0
2019-06-04 03:12:09Z
52780308788546