Jumat, 03 Mei 2019

5 major moments you missed during Miss USA 2019 (including the monokinis) - USA TODAY

Didn't have time to tune into the 2019 Miss USA pageant? We've got you covered.

From diversity to interesting music choices, we've rounded up highlights from this year's competition, which saw Miss North Carolina Cheslie Kryst take home the crown in Reno, Nevada Thursday. 

The 28-year-old lawyer from Charlotte said she was glad to be competing in Nevada because it's the first and only state in the nation with female majorities in both houses of the state legislature.

Alejandra Gonzalez of New Mexico was the first-runner up, and Oklahoma's Triana Browne the second-runner up during the competition.

Here are five major moments you missed from the show.

More: North Carolina lawyer Cheslie Kryst takes the Miss USA crown

A diverse Top 3

One thing this year's competition wasn't lacking? Diversity. 

The top three competitors were all minorities: winner Miss North Carolina (Kryst) is African-American; Miss New Mexico (Gonzalez) is a first generation Mexican-American); and Miss Oklahoma (Browne) said onstage she's a proud member of the Chickasaw Nation whose father is white and mother is African American.

Browne commented on diversity during the Q&A round of the competition. "That's what Miss USA represents, is a diverse woman," said the 26-year-old.

“Throughout my life, I was bullied for being too black for the white kids and too white for the black kids. I was even told once to go back to my country,” Browne said. “I decided to bridge the divide... I am Chickasaw, African-American and Caucasian. I am representation of our great multicultural nation.”

More: Miss USA pageant gets political with questions on immigration, gun violence

The top 10 was also a diverse group, with Miss Arkansas, Miss Ohio, Miss Kansas, Miss North Carolina, Miss District of Colombia, Miss New Mexico, Miss Maryland, Miss Florida, Miss Nevada and Miss Oklahoma.

One-piece swimsuits mixed in with bikinis

During this year's show, two contestants swapped out the standard bikini for a floral one-piece suit. Miss Ohio and Miss Iowa wore one-shouldered monokinis that covered up a bit more skin, but still had a cut-out at the waist. 

Demi-Leigh Nel-Peters' huge engagement ring

Miss Universe 2017 Nel-Peters, who acted as a judge during this year's competition, flashed her huge engagement ring during the broadcast. The South African model and pageant titleholder is engaged to professional football player Tim Tebow.

Nick Lachey serenaded the ladies

During the evening gown portion of the pageant, the competitors weren't the only ones soaking up the spotlight.

Co-host Lachey took to the stage singing "The Way You Look Tonight" as women showed off their gorgeous gowns. 

Lachey's wife, Vanessa Lachey, co-hosted.

A Lizzo song caused a Twitter eruption

Lachey's singing wasn't the only music that caused a stir during the night. During the swimsuit competition, Lizzo's "Juice," which is all about body positivity and celebrating curves, played while svelte contestants walked onstage – and viewers had mixed reactions.

"Yaaaas for ‘Juice’ by @lizzo being the song these ladies walk out to during the swimsuit portion," one person tweeted.

Other's were a little confused by the choice.

"Anybody else find it interesting that they’re choosing to play Lizzo at the Miss USA pageant??? Seems like a bunch of skinny girls walking the catwalk in bikinis might not have been what she was thinking of when she did 'Juice,' " one person tweeted.

"ILYSM @lizzo but WHO signed off on 'Juice' for the *swimsuit* competition of Miss USA, of all parts," one person tweeted.

And some wanted to know Lizzo's thoughts on the music choice.

"Is @lizzo into her song being played for the Miss USA swimsuit round?" one person tweeted.

Lizzo has yet to comment

Contributing: The Associated Press

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/tv/2019/05/02/miss-usa-5-things-you-missed-during-pageant/3658310002/

2019-05-03 03:16:00Z
CAIiEJgRo7ZMzgxUj7VXn0Py9DwqGQgEKhAIACoHCAowjsP7CjCSpPQCMKGi0wU

Kamis, 02 Mei 2019

Sophie Turner wears jumpsuit at surprise Vegas wedding to Joe Jonas - Page Six

Sophie Turner married Joe Jonas in a surprise Las Vegas ceremony on Wednesday night, and her outfit was just as unconventional.

The “Game of Thrones” actress, 23, walked down the aisle to greet Jonas, 29, and their Elvis impersonator officiant wearing a white bridal jumpsuit by Ukranian brand Bevza and a matching veil.

The one-piece silk design features a deep V-neck, wide-leg silhouette and an elastic waistband, which no doubt kept the bride comfy as she danced to country duo Dan + Shay’s live performance of their hit song “Speechless.” The jumpsuit is currently available for pre-order and costs $648.

She paired the comfy set with gold Loeffler Randall mules ($395).

Sophie Turner in a Bevza bridal jumpsuit
Sophie Turner in a Bevza bridal jumpsuitInstagram; Bevza

Also present at A Little White Wedding Chapel were Joe’s bandmate brothers Nick and Kevin, who served as groomsmen wearing matching gray suits. The couple, who wed after the Billboard Music Awards, exchanged ring pops in place of wedding bands.

The couple got engaged in October 2017. Turner previously revealed that her “GoT” co-star Maisie Williams (who was absent from the Vegas nuptials) would be serving as one of two maids of honor, so it appears they will still have a second wedding in France as planned.

Perhaps Turner will pick a traditional gown the second time around — though it’s doesn’t seem likely for this spontaneous couple.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://pagesix.com/2019/05/02/sophie-turner-wears-jumpsuit-at-surprise-vegas-wedding-to-joe-jonas/

2019-05-02 16:27:00Z
52780283518313

Will Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Meet With Donald Trump? - The Cheat Sheet

It has recently been announced that Donald Trump will return to the United Kingdom for an official state visit.

This comes almost a year after his last trip across the pond, and many people are wondering whether the president will meet with any other royal family members aside from Queen Elizabeth.

More specifically, will the American Meghan Markle and her husband Prince Harry be in attendance? Here’s what we know.

Donald Trump is meeting with Queen Elizabeth in June

President Donald Trump
President Donald Trump | Pete Marovich/Getty Images

Unlike last year when Donald Trump came to the U.K. on a working visit, this time, it has been reported that Queen Elizabeth has invited Trump and his wife Melania to her country for an official state visit, which will include more formal events like a banquet.

Donald Trump’s trip will take place from June 3 to 5. This coincides closely with the 75th anniversary of D-Day on June 6, so the queen and the Trump couple will attend a ceremony in Portsmouth, England – a place that played an important role in the D-Day invasion.

Donald Trump will also meet with British Prime Minister Theresa May at her office on Downing Street. According to Theresa May, this visit would be an “opportunity to strengthen our already close relationship in areas such as trade, investment, security and defence, and to discuss how we can build on these ties in the years ahead.”

Will Meghan Markle and Prince Harry meet with Donald Trump?

It’s not uncommon for working royals to show up at an event or two when Queen Elizabeth meets with heads of state from other countries. However, right now, it seems unlikely that Meghan Markle will be there to greet Donald and Melania Trump.

Meghan Markle is American and would be invited to take part in the visit if this were another president, but she herself has actually been vocal about her distaste for Donald Trump ever since his presidential campaign. It’s not too surprising considering the fact that she is a feminist and is against many things that Trump stands for. She once called him “divisive” and “misogynistic.”

Furthermore, Meghan Markle is about to have her baby any day, so she can go on maternity leave for a few months. Of course, whether she will actually make use of the whole maternity leave period is something we can’t predict (after all, Meghan herself is a go-getter who works a lot), but the timing of Trump’s visit seems a bit too soon for Meghan to return to royal duties.

Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, is in the same boat as his wife and is not a fan of Donald Trump. A source once shared that Harry thinks Trump is “a serious threat to human rights.”

Additionally, in the 1990s, Trump apparently used to stalk Harry’s mother, Princess Diana, and even claim that he could have “nailed” her if he wanted to. As such, it might also be unlikely for Prince Harry to meet Donald Trump. He could choose to simply stay home with Meghan and their newborn child.

Will other royal family members meet with Donald Trump?

Of course, what we have to remember is that royal family members are not supposed to be affiliated with any political party. They must leave behind personal views and be good hosts to whoever is visiting, which is why Queen Elizabeth is continuing her tradition of having state visits with U.S. presidents even despite growing protests against Donald Trump.

However, it’s still unclear whether Prince Charles or Prince William will show up. During Trump’s last visit to the UK, both Charles and William refused to meet with him. Normally, Prince Charles would often accompany Queen Elizabeth, but the queen was by herself that time.

Aside from Trump being creepy toward Princess Diana a long time ago, he has done other offensive things to the royal family. For example, he blamed Prince William’s wife, Kate Middleton, when topless pictures of her sunbathing at a private residence were leaked to the press.

“Kate Middleton is great–but she shouldn’t be sunbathing in the nude–only herself to blame,” Trump tweeted. “Who wouldn’t take Kate’s picture and make lots of money if she does the nude sunbathing thing. Come on Kate!”

Nevertheless, the last time that Donald Trump came to the United Kingdom and people were whispering about how Charles and William were nowhere to be seen, the palace said: “This was not a state visit and the involvement of other members of the royal family would be different.”

Thus, we have reasons to believe that perhaps this time either Prince Charles or Prince William will put their dislike for Donald Trump at home and show up next to the queen with a smile on their face.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/will-meghan-markle-and-prince-harry-meet-with-donald-trump.html/

2019-05-02 15:55:55Z
52780280677718

It’s Time To Talk About Thor In "Avengers: Endgame" - BuzzFeed News

Courtesy of Marvel

Chris Hemsworth as Thor.

There’s a feeling every fat person knows. It happens in that moment when you’re watching something and enjoying it, and then suddenly it’s like you’ve been slapped in the face. Your stomach sinks and your heart twists and your chest tightens. Your smile dies and tears might even form in your eyes.

You’ve been hit with a fat joke.

Fat jokes can come from the most unexpected places at the most unexpected times. It’s not out of the ordinary to hear them in the mouths of otherwise kind characters, within shows and movies that are lauded as progressive and inclusive (I’m looking at you, Parks and Recreation and Brooklyn 99). When a fat character is involved, it’s almost guaranteed that there will be fat jokes, or at the very least, the fat character will be the joke.

It’s why, as a fat person, I carefully monitor the media I consume. If I know there’s going to be a fat character, I have to consider whether it’s worth watching a show or movie where I might find bodies like mine being mocked or shamed. When I do turn on media with a fat character, I hope for the best but expect the worst. I brace for it to hurt.

Sometimes, though, I don’t get the chance to prepare myself. Sometimes the fat joke blindsides me and leaves me breathless in ways I could never have anticipated. Like when one of my favorite celebrities dons a dehumanizing fat suit, turning one of my favorite characters into a walking, talking fat joke.

Yes, I’m talking about Fat Thor.

Fat Thor in Avengers: Endgame shocked me and absolutely broke my heart. But he’s just the latest, glaring example that while things may be improving for fat representation on the whole, there’s still a long way to go — especially when it comes to male characters.

Courtesy of Disney

Thor in Thor: Ragnarok.

It’s not an exaggeration to say that Avengers: Endgame was probably the most anticipated movie of the year. It was certainly my most anticipated movie. I’ve been obsessed with the Marvel Cinematic Universe since around 2011 — because while I enjoyed Iron Man and its sequel, it was the release of Thor in that year that really got me hooked.

There was something about seeing Chris Hemsworth playing a literal god, stomping around spouting vaguely Shakespearean lines and being mildly and affectionately objectified that really sucked me in. My love for the character only grew over the years, reaching new heights with Thor: Ragnarok (2017), as director Taika Waititi unleashed his chaotic energy into the MCU and crafted a movie that allowed Hemsworth’s comedic talents to shine, even while stripping Thor of his girlfriend, his father, his eye, his best friends, his hammer and his homeland.

Hemsworth, under Waititi’s direction, plays Thor as a three-dimensional hero who can deliver one-liners but also, crucially, show emotional vulnerability. And by Odin, is he powerful. By the end of that movie, Thor has realized that the external things he’s relied on to define his worth — his father’s opinion, his hammer — aren’t as important as he thought, and what really matters is what’s within. His power comes from himself, and the moment he embraces this and soars through the sky in a streak of lightning, set to the sound of Led Zeppelin's “The Immigrant Song,” is one of the most glorious moments in MCU history. Ultimately, Thor: Ragnarok is a movie about a man learning to love himself — not in a cocky way, as Thor does in the beginning of the series, but in a way that recognizes his true worth.

Fat Thor shocked me and absolutely broke my heart.

This theme powers Thor through the events of last year’s Avengers: Infinity War. Despite losing half his people and his brother at the outset of the movie, Thor shelves his grief and moves forward with a determination born of his hard-earned self-belief. While there are many funny moments in relation to Thor’s character — including jokes about how beautiful his body is — Thor is allowed quiet scenes of contemplation as well as huge, action-packed sequences that showcase his power and heroism.

But one crucial thing happens in Infinity War that sets Thor on a darker path. As he confidently battles the supervillain Thanos, Thor sinks a blow into Thanos that should kill him — but it doesn’t. “Should have gone for the head,” Thanos berates Thor, right before snapping his fingers and erasing half of all life in the universe. Thor gets a front row seat to the disaster, knowing he came this close to preventing it. On top of all the trauma he’s already experienced in the lead up to Infinity War, it’s one hit too many for him, and he breaks.

Avengers: Endgame had a unique opportunity to explore Thor’s PTSD and depression in a nuanced and meaningful way. What does it look like when an actual god fails? How does someone with power literally running through their veins grapple with the idea that they were still powerless in the face of destruction and death?

According to Joe and Anthony Russo, the brothers who directed Avengers: Endgame, the answer to such questions is alcoholism, binge-eating, a general lack of self-care, and subsequent weight gain. These things aren’t inherently problematic. A fat, depressed, alcoholic Thor could have led to a really interesting and refreshing exploration of mental health and addiction, and the way those things intersect with masculinity and the expectations placed on men and “heroes.” It could have been a golden example of how a fat man could still be powerful, and worthy, and attractive, and a superhero.

Instead, it becomes the comic relief of the movie. While other characters are given space to grieve and make inspirational speeches and try to move on with their lives, Thor wallows. His trauma is never treated with sincerity or respect. He’s become fat and lazy, dirty and gross, and for that he is punished. The camera lingers on his bloated torso, in a cruel subversion of the loving gaze normally aimed at a shirtless and ripped Thor. Other characters mock his appearance, comparing him to “melted ice cream” and suggesting Cheese Whiz flows through his veins.

A fat, depressed, alcoholic Thor could have led to a really interesting and refreshing exploration of mental health and addiction. 

Even one of the few sincere moments Thor gets in the movie — when he encounters his dead mother and gets to have a conversation with her about who he is and who he wants to be — is undercut when she nastily tells him to “eat a salad.”

Meanwhile, the rest of the characters don’t really challenge the idea that Thor is less worthy because he is fat. When he tries to wear the new Infinity Gauntlet and reverse the damage done by Thanos’ snap, the other characters panic and push him away, as if his mere proximity could do damage. And while Thor does get his hammer, Mjolnir, back and manages to land a couple of hits against Thanos in the final battle, it’s Captain America who receives the shining moment of glory with Thor’s hammer in his hand. While it’s a cool moment, proving the long-held fan theory that Steve is “worthy,” it’s also another way the story systematically sidelines Fat Thor.

Indeed, even when Thor is fighting Thanos, he barely makes any impact, which is a stark contrast to the way Thor was able to overpower him in Infinity War. Cumulatively, the message is clear: Thor is not what he was, and, just as his muscular physique once communicated his power, his fatness is now the embodiment of his weakness.

I could give the filmmakers the benefit of the doubt and believe they intended for Thor’s journey to be meaningful (although the constant stream of fat jokes certainly belies that). Whatever the intention, though, the effect was this: I sat in a theater and felt my excitement turn to heartache as Thor swung his fat-suited body clumsily across the screen, and everyone around me laughed. I had to endure that laughter every single time — every single time — the padded-up Thor appeared over the course of the next three hours. The laughter was never with Thor, but always at his expense. Even when he wasn’t doing anything particularly funny, the audience giggled, because isn’t it hilarious that Thor has a gut?!

The laughter was never with Thor, but always at his expense.

I was shocked to see Thor treated this way, even more so because I thought we were finally moving forward as a culture. Lately, there’s been, if not a proliferation, then a few baby steps towards more widespread and positive fat representation on screen. Through movies like Dumplin’ and Isn’t It Romantic, and TV shows like Good Girls and Shrill, fat characters are finally being shown as desirable, lovable, powerful and human, without being reduced to the butt of the joke.

There have even been fat superheroes, thanks to the Netflix reboot of the ’80s cartoon She-Ra and the Princesses of Power. The show casts aside the one-size-fits-all generic bodies of the original and reimagines the characters in a diverse range of body types, with more than one plus-size character. Their weight and size is never commented upon, and they are all just as powerful as one another. It shouldn’t feel so revelatory, but it does.

What’s significant about all these positive representations is that every single one of them focuses on fat (and predominantly white) women. As a fat woman yearning to see myself reflected on screen, until now I have largely embraced this fact. I’ve reasoned that fat men have long been more visible in pop culture — and even portrayed as desirable. Consider the incredibly long list of fat men depicted in (mostly) loving relationships with (mostly) thin women across decades of pop culture — like The Simpsons, Family Guy, and The King of Queens, to name a few.

The thing is, while fat male characters might have been more visible, it doesn’t mean the representation has always been positive. Most of the time, fatness in male characters is associated with laziness and buffoonery. In all of the examples I’ve listed above, comedy is derived from the sloppy, foolish husband being nagged by his thin, uptight wife. Their body types are visual shorthand for their internal lives, reinforcing damaging stereotypes that suggest being fat is a character flaw.

These stereotypes crop up again and again whenever fat men are portrayed on screen. For characters like Schmidt in New Girl and Terry in Brooklyn 99, their former fatness is symbolic of their prior failings. By shedding the weight, they’ve become better, stronger versions of themselves. Their fat bodies (portrayed with fat suits) are treated as both a punchline and a horror they’ve escaped from.

Most of the time, fatness in male characters is associated with laziness and buffoonery.

Conversely, in Avengers: Endgame, Thor has left the better, stronger version of himself behind. His fat body is a physical manifestation of his mental state — that is, a mess — and yet the audience is invited to laugh at it, and by extension his trauma, along with the other characters. It’s hard to imagine a character like Scarlett Johansson's Black Widow being slapped in a fat suit and mercilessly mocked about her size by those who are supposed to be her friends. (Then again, Avengers: Endgame did fridge her character, so the movie is not exactly a beacon of feminism.) Still, it’s astonishing that such a plotline about Thor made it to the big screen in 2019.

Marvel has traded on the sex appeal of its stars — and of Thor in particular — for over a decade. They’ve reinforced time and time again what a hero looks like — tall, muscular, waxed, oiled, white, male. They’ve expanded that somewhat in recent years through the likes of Black Panther and Captain Marvel, although the physical appearance of superheroes even in those movies largely conforms to the same old narrow constraints of what beauty is. With Fat Thor, Marvel had the chance to push those boundaries further. Instead, they diminished his hero status. It was as though the fatter he got, the less he was worth.

Which leaves fat people sitting in the audience – people like me, and no doubt countless others, including little kids – feeling pretty worthless too.

Fat men and fat women deserve the chance to be heroes. They deserve the chance to be people.

They deserve to be more than a fat joke.●


Jenna Guillaume is a Sydney-based freelance writer and the author of What I Like About Me, a body positive YA rom-com.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/jennaguillaume/avengers-endgame-fat-thor-chris-hemsworth-body-positivity

2019-05-02 15:25:00Z
52780280635096

Here's What You Need To Know About The Beyoncé/Taylor Swift Drama At The BBMAs - BuzzFeed

So, last night was the Billboard Music Awards. I'm sure you already know that because the internet is a thing and people didn't stop talking about it all night. Drake was the big winner, walking away with an unfathomable 12 awards.

Amy Sussman / Getty Images

I guess you could say Joe Jonas and Sophie Turner were also big winners on the night, considering they left the BBMAs and got freakin' MARRIED!

Anyway, what you might be surprised to know is that there was also drama on the night between Beyoncé fans and Taylor Swift fans, a wild concept considering Beyoncé wasn't even in attendance. But hey, that's where I come in to explain what the hell is going on.

The Wendy Williams Show

So, it all started when Taylor opened the BBMAs with a performance of her new song, "Me". People loved it but tbh I was too busy concentrating on Brendon Urie, who descended from the ceiling like Mary freakin' Poppins.

Kevin Winter / Getty Images

Brendon Urie look at me like this challenge.

Kevin Winter / Getty Images

Anyway, Brendan wasn't a part of the drama, he was just there looking adorable and serving vocals. The issue stemmed from the beginning of the performance, which opened with a marching band before Taylor strutted on stage and struck a pose.

However, Beyoncé fans immediately noticed a similarity. Remember Homecoming, the Netflix documentary about Bey's performance at Coachella? Well, it starts in a similar way, from the whistle blow at the beginning to the marching band intro.

Larry Busacca / Getty Images

And it was very clear that people weren't happy about it.

TAYLOR SWIFT JUST BIT TF OUTTA BEYONCE ON THE BILLBOARD AWARDS ... I’m 💀😭😭😭💀💀💀💀 where is the beyhive????

I don’t know if y’all are seeing this but Taylor Swift is gentrifying Beyonce’s Coachella performance right now

In fact, they weren't happy at all.

TS: Beyoncé can I copy your homework? Bey: Sure just change it up a little so it doesn’t look obviously

Of course, it didn't take long for Taylor Swift fans to bite back, and from then on, it was just all out war.

#Mayochella everyone cyber bullying Taylor Swift as if Beyoncé invented whistles, drums and putting your hand on your hip. Beyoncé is an icon but you're all assholes and honestly so stupid if you think that either Beyoncé or Taylor care about what you think.

beyonce invented standing on stage with two legs how could taylor do that ??? SHE'S A COPY CAT BEYONCE DID THAT FIRST 😡😡😡 https://t.co/Jv3iOjaB5s

I AM SICK AND TIRED OF YOU ALL ATTACKING @taylorswift13 HER PERFORMANCE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH BEYONCÉ. LEAVE TAYLOR ALONE. SHE JUST WANTS TO BE FUCKING HAPPY OMFG YALL ARE TRASH.

Interestingly, Beyoncé's art director tweeted amidst the drama, simply posting a crying face emoji. Who knows what that was in reference to...

Anyway, others said that people shouldn't compare the two and both Bey and Tay are super successful in their own right.

Girl, it’s drums... Beyoncé wasn’t the first to use drums in a performance and Taylor definitely isn’t either. Beyoncé had a whole as band and Taylor had just drums. Y’all need to stop comparing the most general things just because you don’t like Taylor. https://t.co/ORySBD7tQf

I can’t believe that twitter has gotten to the point where people are comparing Beyoncé and Taylor’s drum lines.. so Taylor used drums, lots of people do big whoop.. I love Bey but this really isn’t THAT big of a deal

Let's also not forget that Beyoncé and Taylor are at least on friendly terms. Back in 2009, when Kanye West infamously interrupted Taylor's VMAs acceptance speech, Beyoncé later invited Taylor up on stage to give the speech again.

Christopher Polk / Getty Images

And there doesn't seem to be an obvious reason that the two wouldn't still be on friendly terms now.

Michael Kovac / WireImage

Beyoncé has even attended Taylor's birthday parties in the past.

Oh, and conspiracy theory time.

*taps microphone* you are aware that music industry power players like Taylor and Beyoncé are aware of each other’s next moves & that Taylor incorporating a drumline 2 weeks after Homecoming came out was probably manufactured to make us all talk about them both more, right?

Meanwhile, Paula Abdul was doing this, which I think deserves waaaaay more attention.

BuzzFeed has reached out to reps of Beyoncé and Taylor for comment.

Ben Henry is a celebrity reporter for BuzzFeed UK and is based in London.

Contact Ben Henry at ben.henry@buzzfeed.com.

Got a confidential tip? Submit it here.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.buzzfeed.com/benhenry/taylor-swift-beyonce-bbmas-drama

2019-05-02 13:56:57Z
52780279427639

Captain Marvel in Endgame Poses a Problem for the MCU - /FILM

captain marvel in endgame

Captain Marvel is an entertaining film. It’s not one of the best entries in the MCU, but it’s fun to watch, and Brie Larson makes for a great, sarcastic, no bullshit superhero. Larson’s Carl Danvers/Captain Marvel is, in short, a great new addition to the Marvel Cinematic Universe. But the MCU has a serious Captain Marvel problem: they don’t know what to do with her.

This isn’t Larson’s fault. Nor is it the character’s fault. The problem boils down to this: Carol is so powerful, that the only solution the MCU can think of level the playing field is to sideline her. Spoilers follow.

Brie Larson’s Captain Marvel made quite an impression in Avengers: Endgame. First, she gets a cool new haircut. Second, she gets to kick some serious ass. But we have to wait a very long time to see that. Almost three full hours, in fact. On one hand, you can understand why this is happening. Endgame has a ton of characters to deal with, and not everyone can get the same amount of screentime. But the sidelining of Carol Danvers in the film seems ill-advised, especially since the film is being released after the standalone Captain Marvel movie just introduced her. Why have that movie at all, if she’s barely going to figure in to the movie? Why not just introduce her in Endgame?

It genuinely seems like Marvel doesn’t know what to do with Carol. Much like Superman, Carol is superpowered to the extreme. Writers and filmmakers have been struggling with this in regard to Superman for years. How do you make someone so invincible, so unstoppable, engaging? What’s the point in putting a character like that in danger, when we always know they’ll come out ahead? More often than not, storytellers introduce some sort of weakness to exploit in order to bring Superman down a few notches.

But Endgame doesn’t have time for that. So instead, it sends Carol off into space, only to bring her in in the final battle to kick some butt. When she shows up, it’s exciting. She bursts through the atmosphere in a sonic boom, and pummels Thanos in ways the other heroes could not. Watching Carol unload on Thanos, it becomes clear why Endgame waited so long to bring her back. Had she been around sooner, Thanos would’ve been stopped much quicker. On the surface, this is fine – because that’s what the story requires. The story demands that Thanos stay alive a little longer, which means Carol can’t go punching his big, stupid purple face into oblivion.

But surely there has to be a better solution than benching her, like an injured football player. The character deserves better than that. As do the character’s fans. To be fair, Marvel is just getting started with Carol Danvers. Hopefully in films to come, writers and directors will find clever, exciting ways to keep Carol in a story while also keeping her mega-powers from ending the story too quickly. But that takes work. It takes commitment. It takes time. And the Endgame screenwriters just didn’t have that time.

Which means I should probably cut them some slack. Yet it bothers me. Give us more Brie Larson. Give us more Carol Danvers. Don’t introduce a character, write yourself into a corner, and then shrug and push her off to the side. Find new ways to keep us engrossed, and keep her part of the action. If filmmakers have managed to do this with Superman several times, there’s no reason they can’t do the same with Captain Marvel.

“She’s one of the most powerful – and one of the most popular – characters in our comics,” Marvel Studios chief Kevin Feige said of Captain Marvel, “and will be the most powerful character in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.” That’s great! Now find a way to make it work, please.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.slashfilm.com/captain-marvel-in-endgame/

2019-05-02 14:00:25Z
52780280635096

Did 'Avengers: Endgame' Quietly Reveal the Next Thor? - Hollywood Reporter

Though Chris Hemsworth's Odinson decided he no longer wanted the mantle and joined the Guardians of the Galaxy, could a new Thor be on the horizon?

[This story contains spoilers for Avengers: Endgame]

Avengers: Endgame gave audiences a Thor like they've never seen before. Chris Hemsworth's God of Thunder was broken and depressed following his failure to kill Thanos (Josh Brolin) in Avengers: Infinity War. He spent Endgame on a journey of self-discovery that saw him reconnect in the past with his mother who offered him some profound advice. "Everyone fails at who they're supposed to be, Thor. The measure of a person, of a hero, is how well they succeed at being who they are."

By the time that the film ended, he seemed to have taken his mother's words to heart and joined the (As)Guardians of the Galaxy for some intergalactic adventures, but not before entrusting Valkyrie (Tessa Thompson) as the new ruler of Asgard. It seems like perhaps she could be in line to be the new Thor,  there was also another woman whose Endgame appearance hints she could be in line for the mantle as well.

Though Thor Odinson is the most famous hero to wear the mantle, in the comics there have been others who've taken on the name of Thor. There was an arc that began in 2014's Original Sin series from Jason Aaron and Mike Deodato Jr. which saw the blonde haired hero suddenly find himself unworthy to wield Mjolnir, the hammer which traditionally gives him his powers. Soon after, an enigmatic woman was able to pick up the mighty mythical weapon and become the powerful god-like hero known as Thor. It was later revealed that this figure was none other than Jane Foster, Thor's former partner who was played by Natalie Portman in Thor (2011) and Thor: The Dark World (2013).

This wasn't actually the first time that Foster had taken on the role, as a 1978 issue of Marvel's alternate reality What If? series imagined what would've happened if Jane had been one the one to find the magic hammer. Aaron and Deodato. expanded on that with a story which saw the real Jane Foster going through chemotherapy whilst living a double life as the masked hero with the hammer giving her the powers to fight despite her illness. It was a huge reveal that stunned fans and eventually saw Jane take on the role of Thor in her own series, The Mighty Thor, as well as joining the Avengers.

Though Odinson eventually returned to his birthright, it was a powerful period that set up an exciting future for one of the MCU's brightest. The character who was portrayed in the MCU by Portman was a key part of Thor and it's sequel, Thor: The Dark World, but was apparently unhappy with the studio's decision to split with the sequel's original director, Patty Jenkins, and didn't return for Thor: Ragnarok. With all of Avenger's time travel, though, fans got to see Foster once again in Endgame as Thor and Rocket (Bradley Cooper and Sean Gunn) navigated the gilded halls of Asgard looking for one of the Infinity Stones.

Portman's appearance in the film and at the Endgame premiere did get fans wondering if Jane might be taking on a larger role in the future of the MCU. I suspect that Valkyrie is more likely to take over for Thor should he need a replacement. Tessa Thompson's avenging angel was the breakout character of 2017's Thor: Ragnarok. Though her Endgame screentime was minimal, she did get to fly on a pegasus and gain a new royal title.

So what is the likelihood of Valkyrie picking up Mjolnir? The hammer's whereabouts are currently unknown after Captain America disappeared back into the past with it, but when it eventually rears its head again, there is actually comic book precedent for Valkyrie wielding Mjolnir and taking on the name of Thor. During a 2009 series called Ultimatum, the X-Men's most fearsome foe Magneto gained control of Thor's hammer and tried to take over the world. After a battle to reclaim the Asgardian weapon, an alternate universe version of Valkyrie managed to beat the villain. In the continuation of the story, New Ultimates, it was revealed that she was in fact now Thor and was wielding the hammer that she took from Magneto.

Could Thompson's version follow suit? For now,  she's busy protecting and building the realm of New Asgard. But when the New Avengers come-a-calling in need of an Asgardian to help the save the world from the next inevitable threat, don't be surprised if Valkyrie is there, perhaps with Mjolnir in hand.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/did-avengers-endgame-quietly-reveal-next-thor-1205513

2019-05-02 13:15:00Z
52780280635096